The Relation between Efficient Risk-Sharing Arrangements and Firm Characteristics: Evidence from the Managed Care Industry

2002 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
pp. 99-117 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrew J. Leone

This study examines contracts between HMOs and Primary Care Physicians. These contracts represent one important component of HMOs' management control systems. I argue that HMOs design contracts to minimize agency costs that arise from the physician moral hazard problem. The agency costs and resulting HMO-physician-payment arrangements depend on an HMO's organizational form, customer mix, and environment. Physicians can work as HMO employees or as independent contractors operating individually or in group practice. These features, together with the HMO ownership structure, determine the HMO's organizational form. The level of Medicare enrollment characterizes the HMO's customer mix. The empirical results presented in this study are generally consistent with the theory.




2012 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
pp. 68-87 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sigismundo Bialoskorski Neto ◽  
Marcelo Barroso ◽  
Amaury Rezende


2012 ◽  
Vol 51 (4II) ◽  
pp. 161-183 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fahad Abdullah ◽  
Attaullah Shah ◽  
Safi Ullah Khan

More than two centuries ago, Adam Smith (1776) showed skepticism about the efficiency of joint stock companies because of the separation of management from ownership. He observed that managers of joint stock companies cannot be expected to watch over the business with the same anxious vigilance as owners in a partnership would. Adam Smith’s worry remained buried for a century and a half until Berle and Means (1932) rekindled interest in this area when they hypothesised in their book that dispersed shareholding is an inefficient form of ownership structure. They argued that separation of ownership and management control has changed the role of owner from being active to the passive agent. Dispersed shareholders lack incentives to monitor self-interested managers who possess only a small fraction of the total shareholdings. The propositions by Adam Smith (1776) and Berle and Means (1932) received some support when Jensen and Meckling (1976) tied together the elements of property rights, agency costs, and finance to develop a theory of ownership structure of a firm. Jensen and Meckling asserted that agency costs are real, which the owner can reduce either by increasing ownership stake of the agent in the firm or by incurring monitoring and bonding costs. In early tests, several research studies supported the views of Jensen and Meckling. However, these studies did not account for endogeneity problem.



Author(s):  
Sigismundo Bialoskorski Neto ◽  
Marcelo F. G. Barroso ◽  
Amaury José Rezende






CFA Digest ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 43 (2) ◽  
pp. 14-16
Author(s):  
Gregory G. Gocek


Author(s):  
Jacobo Gomez-Conde ◽  
Ricardo Malagueño ◽  
Ernesto Lopez-Valeiras ◽  
Fabricia Rosa ◽  
Rogerio Lunkes


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document