Faculty Positions

2021 ◽  
Vol 46 (4) ◽  
pp. 476-476
Keyword(s):  
Author(s):  
John Reid

This article traces the author’s path from early life in the United Kingdom to graduate school in Newfoundland and New Brunswick and then to a series of faculty positions – ultimately, at Saint Mary’s University. Early work in the seventeenth-century history of northern New England gave way to a more broadly comparative approach to this era and, eventually, to an effort to coordinate imperial, colonial, and Indigenous history in northeastern North America. A variety of career uncertainties and evolutions also led to involvement in the history of higher education, the history of Atlantic Canada, and the history of sport. Through it all, collaborative work developed as a recurrent approach, with Atlantic Canada themes frequently underpinning responses to a variety of historiographies.


2020 ◽  
Vol 117 (17) ◽  
pp. 9284-9291 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bas Hofstra ◽  
Vivek V. Kulkarni ◽  
Sebastian Munoz-Najar Galvez ◽  
Bryan He ◽  
Dan Jurafsky ◽  
...  

Prior work finds a diversity paradox: Diversity breeds innovation, yet underrepresented groups that diversify organizations have less successful careers within them. Does the diversity paradox hold for scientists as well? We study this by utilizing a near-complete population of ∼1.2 million US doctoral recipients from 1977 to 2015 and following their careers into publishing and faculty positions. We use text analysis and machine learning to answer a series of questions: How do we detect scientific innovations? Are underrepresented groups more likely to generate scientific innovations? And are the innovations of underrepresented groups adopted and rewarded? Our analyses show that underrepresented groups produce higher rates of scientific novelty. However, their novel contributions are devalued and discounted: For example, novel contributions by gender and racial minorities are taken up by other scholars at lower rates than novel contributions by gender and racial majorities, and equally impactful contributions of gender and racial minorities are less likely to result in successful scientific careers than for majority groups. These results suggest there may be unwarranted reproduction of stratification in academic careers that discounts diversity’s role in innovation and partly explains the underrepresentation of some groups in academia.


2008 ◽  
Vol 72 (3) ◽  
pp. 370-385 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jacqueline E. Chmar ◽  
Richard G. Weaver ◽  
Richard W. Valachovic

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document