scholarly journals Student Loan Relief Programs: Implications for Borrowers and the Federal Government

2016 ◽  
Vol 2016 (1609) ◽  
Author(s):  
Wenhua Di ◽  
◽  
Kelly D. Edmiston ◽  
Author(s):  
Elizabeth Tandy Shermer

American higher education expanded significantly in the economic boom years following the Second World War. The federal government underwrote the growth of these institutions as providers of mass education and as modern research universities. Presidents played a key role in nurturing the nascent student loan industry.


2017 ◽  
Vol 671 (1) ◽  
pp. 224-248 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wenhua Di ◽  
Kelly D. Edmiston

As college costs increase and more students fund their education through borrowing, debt load and delinquency rates have become significant problems. This article discusses the impacts of the federal student loan repayment relief programs that are available. The implications of relief plans on borrowers’ costs and the federal budget vary by plan and for different loan amounts and income levels, making it challenging for policy-makers to design programs that adequately balance risks between borrowers and taxpayers. Existing programs are also complicated, making it difficult for borrowers to make informed decisions on repayment programs. We examine how the various programs work in practice and consider their likely outcomes over a set of income-debt-program scenarios, bringing clarity to the repayment environment. We find that lower-income borrowers and borrowers who will have significant remaining balances forgiven at the end of the required repayment period are generally more likely to benefit from loan relief programs, but participation of these borrowers can be very costly.


2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert C. Hockett

Ten years after failing and being rescued by our federal government, our nation’s principal secondary market makers in home mortgage loans – Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac – remain in federal receivership. The proximate reason for this is that neither Republicans nor Democrats in Congress have been able to find consensus – interparty or intraparty consensus – on what should be done with our home mortgage GSEs post-crisis. The deeper reason is that public – that is to say, citizen – ownership of secondary market makers in home loans is in a certain sense ‘natural’ in any republic, such as our own, where both middle class standing and that standing’s primary indicator – home-owning – are deeply ingrained in the citizenry’s self-ascribed national identity. This truth is yet more compelling when home prices, as they are bound to do anywhere homes are the primary middle class asset, become what I call 'systemically significant' - that is, when they become pervasive determinants both of other prices and of broader macroeconomic wellbeing. I conclude that the only sustainable future for Fannie and Freddie, not to say for the American middle class and our other GSEs (including our student loan GSEs), is to be found in their past. Fannie and Freddie should be forthrightly made citizen-owned once again as Fannie was through our home markets’ healthiest decades.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document