PRODUCTION PROCESS OF AN AUTOMOTIVE EXHAUST

2016 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Tatiane Ribeiro Santos ◽  
Adriele Seabra ◽  
Alison Pereira ◽  
Maria Aparecida Moreira ◽  
Mariane Pereira
2016 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Tatiane Ribeiro Santos ◽  
Adriele Seabra ◽  
Alison Pereira ◽  
Maria Aparecida Moreira ◽  
Mariane Pereira

2016 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Tatiane Ribeiro Santos ◽  
Adriele Seabra ◽  
Alison Pereira ◽  
Maria Aparecida Moreira ◽  
Mariane Pereira

2016 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Tatiane Ribeiro Santos ◽  
Adriele Seabra ◽  
Alison Pereira ◽  
Maria Aparecida Moreira ◽  
Mariane Pereira

2016 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Tatiane Ribeiro Santos ◽  
Adriele Seabra ◽  
Alison Pereira ◽  
Maria Aparecida Moreira ◽  
Mariane Pereira

2016 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Tatiane Ribeiro Santos ◽  
Adriele Seabra ◽  
Alison Pereira ◽  
Maria Aparecida Moreira ◽  
Mariane Pereira

Author(s):  
Sooho Kim ◽  
M. J. D’Aniello

Automotive catalysts generally lose-agtivity during vehicle operation due to several well-known deactivation mechanisms. To gain a more fundamental understanding of catalyst deactivation, the microscopic details of fresh and vehicle-aged commercial pelleted automotive exhaust catalysts containing Pt, Pd and Rh were studied by employing Analytical Electron Microscopy (AEM). Two different vehicle-aged samples containing similar poison levels but having different catalytic activities (denoted better and poorer) were selected for this study.The general microstructure of the supports and the noble metal particles of the two catalysts looks similar; the noble metal particles were generally found to be spherical and often faceted. However, the average noble metal particle size on the poorer catalyst (21 nm) was larger than that on the better catalyst (16 nm). These sizes represent a significant increase over that found on the fresh catalyst (8 nm). The activity of these catalysts decreases as the observed particle size increases.


2019 ◽  
Vol 28 (9) ◽  
pp. 50-53
Author(s):  
N.N. Martynov ◽  
◽  
G.A. Sidorenko ◽  
G.B. Zinyukhin ◽  
E.Sh. Maneeva ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  

2018 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
pp. 43-55
Author(s):  
Ika Yulianti ◽  
Endah Masrunik ◽  
Anam Miftakhul Huda ◽  
Diana Elvianita

This study aims to find a comparison of the calculation of the cost of goods manufactured in the CV. Mitra Setia Blitar uses the company's method and uses the Job Order Costing (JOC) method. The method used in this study is quantitative. The types of data used are quantitative and qualitative. Quantitative data is in the form of map production cost data while qualitative data is in the form of information about map production process. The result of calculating the cost of production of the map between the two methods results in a difference of Rp. 306. Calculation using the company method is more expensive than using the Job Order Costing method. Calculation of cost of goods manufactured using the company method is Rp. 2,205,000, - or Rp. 2,205, - each unit. While using the Job Order Costing (JOC) method is Rp. 1,899,000, - or Rp 1,899, - each unit. So that the right method used in calculating the cost of production is the Job Order Costing (JOC) method


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document