Edge-to-edge mitral valve repair for isolated prolapse of the anterior leaflet caused by degenerative disease

2007 ◽  
Vol 8 (5) ◽  
pp. 354-358 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carlo Fucci ◽  
Giuseppe De Cicco ◽  
Ermanna Chiari ◽  
Matilde Nardi ◽  
Pompilio Faggiano ◽  
...  
Author(s):  
Burak Onan ◽  
Ersin Kadirogullari ◽  
Zeynep Kahraman ◽  
Onur Sen

Bulging subaortic septum in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy is a potential risk factor for systolic anterior motion after mitral valve repair. Systolic anterior motion may cause postoperative mitral regurgitation and left ventricular outflow tract obstruction despite conservative management. During “minimally invasive endoscopic” and “robotic” mitral repair procedures, systolic anterior motion is prevented with concomitant septal myectomy through the mitral valve orifice. Technically, the exposure of the bulging subaortic septum is traditionally done with detachment of the anterior mitral leaflet from its annulus, leaving a 2-mm rim of leaflet attached to the annulus. The leaflet is then sutured after myectomy. As an alternative technique in robotic surgery, the exposure of the subaortic septum is feasible without anterior leaflet incision with the use of dynamic atrial retractor in mitral repair procedures. Here, we present a patient who underwent concomitant robotic mitral valve repair with posterior chordal implantation, ring annuloplasty, and septal myectomy without anterior leaflet incision using the da Vinci surgical system.


Circulation ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 127 (14) ◽  
pp. 1485-1492 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tirone E. David ◽  
Susan Armstrong ◽  
Brian W. McCrindle ◽  
Cedric Manlhiot

2018 ◽  
Vol 54 (1) ◽  
pp. 91-97 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michele De Bonis ◽  
Elisabetta Lapenna ◽  
Ilaria Giambuzzi ◽  
Roberta Meneghin ◽  
Giovanni Affronti ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 21 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
C Fauvel ◽  
R Breil ◽  
F Doguet ◽  
O Raitiere ◽  
F Bauer

Abstract Background Mitral regurgitation (MR) is the second most common valve disease in Europe with mitral valve repair being the treatment of choice in symptomatic patients with degenerative MR grade 3+. Purpose the study goal is to evaluate the long-term survival, the rate and the predictive factors of reintervention following mitral valve repair. Method All patients admitted for mitral valve repair in the context of significant MR defined by symptoms and/or critical left ventricular enlargement were included in this retrospective registry from January 2001 to 31 December 2011. The only exclusion criteria was scheduled mitral valve repair converted into mitral valve replacement. Results 426 consecutive patients had mitral valve repair. There were 137 women and 289 men with an average age of 62 ± 13 y. Twenty-two percent, 37%, 36% and 5 % patients were in NYHA functional class 1, 2, 3 and 4, respectively. All patients had MR grade 3+. Indication for mitral valve repair was endocarditis (n = 21), ring dilation (n = 21), ischemic functional MR (n = 26), rheumatic mitral valve (n = 8) and degenerative MR (n = 350). Operating room successful attained 95% % for mitral valve repair with only 5% in-hospital conversion to valve replacement. Of the 426 patients discharged after mitral valve repair, 39 patients died with a survival rate of 10.8 years (95% CI [10.4-11.3], 78.5% > 10 years) and 25 were re-operated. The two predictive factors for reintervention were anterior leaflet degeneration (OR = 3.4 IC95% [1.05-9.8]; p = 0.02) and persistence of mitral leak grade 2+ at discharge (OR = 6.7 IC95% [2-22]; p = 0.001). Conclusion Preoperative degenerative anterior leaflet and post-operative persistent grade 2+ mitral regurgitation are the 2 predictive risk factors for reintervention after mitral valve repair for significant MR.


2020 ◽  
Vol 36 (6) ◽  
pp. 563-565
Author(s):  
Vito Domenico Bruno ◽  
Ettorino Di Tommaso ◽  
Raimondo Ascione

Abstract The choice of ring for mitral valve repair is still largely left to the surgeon's preferences and there are no specific guidelines regulating this decision. Despite this previous researches have described important features appertaining to each of the different types of rings currently available. Particularly, the debate is still open in regards to the flexibility that these devices should or should not have. Later in this issue of the Journal, Panicker and colleagues have reported their results with flexible and rigid rings in mitral valve repair. The results are very interesting and once again are highlighting the importance of using the right ring for the right disease.


2010 ◽  
Vol 25 (1) ◽  
pp. 9-15 ◽  
Author(s):  
Louis-Mathieu Stevens ◽  
Arsène-Joseph Basmadjian ◽  
Denis Bouchard ◽  
Ismaïl El-Hamamsy ◽  
Philippe Demers ◽  
...  

2013 ◽  
Vol 95 (4) ◽  
pp. 1462-1463 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zain Khalpey ◽  
Stanton K. Shernan ◽  
Luigino Nascimben ◽  
Sary F. Aranki

2013 ◽  
Vol 146 (1) ◽  
pp. 109-113 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bettina Pfannmüller ◽  
Joerg Seeburger ◽  
Martin Misfeld ◽  
Michael Andrew Borger ◽  
Jens Garbade ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document