Diagnostic Scale for Evaluation of Graduate-Level Teaching Assistants

1983 ◽  
Vol 57 (2) ◽  
pp. 445-446 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gerald M. Meredith ◽  
Todd H. Ogasawara

The TA Evaluator, 20 5-point ratings of the effectiveness of graduate teaching assistants, showed split-half reliability of .95. All 20 items loaded greater than .59 on a single iterative principal axis factor. Average r for 10 items pairs was .55. Use in diagnosis and improvement will be undertaken.

Author(s):  
Jeffrey Robert Galin ◽  
Haley Swartz ◽  
Marianna Gleyzer ◽  
Rachel Copley ◽  
Nicholas Mennona Marino

While much has been written about visual literacy and multimodal teaching, almost nothing has been published on preparing instructors and graduate teaching assistants to provide students with the mechanics of visual design, rhetoric, and cultural criticism to help them build complex, multimodal projects that go beyond visual inclusion and critique. This chapter focuses on a graduate course on visual literacy, rhetoric, and design that was taught by one of the authors and taken by the other four. Grounded in previous claims for visual literacy in the field, the authors open by introducing how and why students can be helped to develop visual arguments. It then introduces the graduate course, and 10 strategies for successful multimodal, project-based teaching, which are exemplified by graduate and undergraduate project examples. The chapter concludes with example assignments from two of the graduate authors and a call for a dedicated cross-disciplinary graduate course for multimodal pedagogy.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nathan McNeill ◽  
Monica Cox ◽  
Heidi Diefes-Dux ◽  
Tenille Medley ◽  
Jeremi Hayes

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document