Feeding Forward in Urban Design Pedagogy: A Critique Strategy

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hesam Kamalipour
Keyword(s):  
Urban Design ◽  
Design Pedagogy

scholarly journals Thomas Sharp’s collaboration with H. de C. Hastings: the formulation of townscape as urban design pedagogy

2009 ◽  
Vol 24 (1) ◽  
pp. 29-49 ◽  
Author(s):  
Erdem Erten
Keyword(s):  
Urban Design ◽  
Design Pedagogy

scholarly journals Urban design pedagogy

2016 ◽  
Vol 21 (5) ◽  
pp. 567-569 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marion Roberts
Keyword(s):  
Urban Design ◽  
Design Pedagogy

Urban Design Pedagogy

2017 ◽  
pp. 268-277
Author(s):  
Elek Pafka ◽  
Kim Dovey
Keyword(s):  
Urban Design ◽  
Design Pedagogy

Urban design pedagogy in smaller cities and schools

2016 ◽  
Vol 21 (5) ◽  
pp. 558-560
Author(s):  
David L. A. Gordon
Keyword(s):  
Urban Design ◽  
Design Pedagogy

The brave new urban design pedagogy: some observations

2016 ◽  
Vol 21 (5) ◽  
pp. 540-544
Author(s):  
Tridib Banerjee
Keyword(s):  
Urban Design ◽  
Design Pedagogy

URBAN DESIGN International

2019 ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Urban Design

Promoting urban design in development plans: typo-morphological approaches in Montreuil, France

2001 ◽  
Vol 6 (3/4) ◽  
pp. 157-172 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hichem Trache
Keyword(s):  
Urban Design ◽  
Development Plans

An Immanent Criticism of Urban Design in Montevideo

2019 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Washington MORALES
Keyword(s):  
Urban Design ◽  
Applied Ethics ◽  
Form Of Life ◽  
Political Reality ◽  
Applied Philosophy ◽  
Points Of View ◽  
Philosophical Frameworks

The debate about the so called “excluding design” has been a focus for applied philosophy for several years. The structure of this debate is constituted by deontological and consequentialist’s applied ethics and as well as agonistic democratic approaches. This paper asks for the applicability of these points of view to the particular socio-political reality of Montevideo. Examining this reality closer, I hold that we cannot comprehend the recent aestheticization of the excluding design there through these contemporary philosophical frameworks. As an alternative philosophical procedure, I analyze the aestheticization of excluding design in Montevideo from Rahel Jaeggi’s immanent criticism. I hold that this process of aestheticization implies an ideological regressive “form of life”. And I also argue that the Uruguayan democracy is affected by this ideological regression. Nevertheless, because this aestheticization is not an exclusive Uruguayan phenomenon, this paper intends to open one direction in applied philosophy of urban design.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document