scholarly journals Farmer driving a pickup truck was struck when a pickup ran a stop sign.

Keyword(s):  
Author(s):  
Brittany N. Campbell ◽  
John D. Smith ◽  
Wassim G. Najm
Keyword(s):  

Author(s):  
Yingfeng (Eric) Li ◽  
Haiyan Hao ◽  
Ronald B. Gibbons ◽  
Alejandra Medina

Even though drivers disregarding a stop sign is widely considered a major contributing factor for crashes at unsignalized intersections, an equally important problem that leads to severe crashes at such locations is misjudgment of gaps. This paper presents the results of an effort to fully understand gap acceptance behavior at unsignalized intersections using SHPR2 Naturalistic Driving Study data. The paper focuses on the findings of two research activities: the identification of critical gaps for common traffic/roadway scenarios at unsignalized intersections, and the investigation of significant factors affecting driver gap acceptance behaviors at such intersections. The study used multiple statistical and machine learning methods, allowing a comprehensive understanding of gap acceptance behavior while demonstrating the advantages of each method. Overall, the study showed an average critical gap of 5.25 s for right-turn and 6.19 s for left-turn movements. Although a variety of factors affected gap acceptance behaviors, gap size, wait time, major-road traffic volume, and how frequently the driver drives annually were examples of the most significant.


Author(s):  
Luca Bravi ◽  
Luca Kubin ◽  
Stefano Caprasecca ◽  
Douglas Coimbra de Andrade ◽  
Matteo Simoncini ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  

2007 ◽  
Vol 27 (2) ◽  
pp. 27-35 ◽  
Author(s):  
Angela R. Lebbon ◽  
John Austin ◽  
Ron Van Houten ◽  
Louis E. Malenfant
Keyword(s):  

1994 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
pp. 21-33 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael R. Baye ◽  
Dan Kovenock
Keyword(s):  

CJEM ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 17 (5) ◽  
pp. 569-570
Author(s):  
Christopher Sampson

A 16-year-old male presented to the emergency department following a single-truck motor vehicle collision. The patient was the driver of an older model pickup truck that he lost control of while driving and went off of the road. He was restrained with a lap belt only, given the age of the vehicle. His only complaint at the presenting hospital was left-sided neck pain and hoarseness.


Author(s):  
Katherine Garcia ◽  
Ian Robertson ◽  
Philip Kortum

The purpose of this study is to compare presentation methods for use in the validation of the Trust in Selfdriving Vehicle Scale (TSDV), a questionnaire designed to assess user trust in self-driving cars. Previous studies have validated trust instruments using traditional videos wherein participants watch a scenario involving an automated system but there are strong concerns about external validity with this approach. We examined four presentation conditions: a flat screen monitor with a traditional video, a flat screen with a 2D 180 video, an Oculus Go VR headset with a 2D 180 video, and an Oculus Go with a 3D VR video. Participants watched eight video scenarios of a self-driving vehicle attempting a right-hand tum at a stop sign and rated their trust in the vehicle shown in the video after each scenario using the TSDV and rated telepresence for the viewing condition. We found a significant interaction between the mean TSDV scores for pedestrian collision and presentation condition. The TSDV mean in the Headset 2D 180 condition was significantly higher than the other three conditions. Additionally, when used to view the scenarios as 3D VR videos, the headset received significantly higher ratings of spatial presence compared to the condition using a flatscreen a 2D video; none of the remaining comparisons were statistically significant. Based on the results it is not recommended that the headset be used for short scenarios because the benefits do not outweigh the costs.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document