scholarly journals Validating Listening Strategies Using Ordinal Response Models

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
◽  
Young-Min Kwon

<p>This thesis illustrates statistical methodology for identifying the effects of explanatory variables, for the response variables with an ordinal nature. The dataset applied to this methodology is a Listening Strategy dataset collected by The Language Learner Strategy Team at the National Institute of Education from Singapore. In this dataset, eight strategies were formed from 38 questions based on Linguistic theory. The core objective of this thesis is to validate whether 38 questions were aggregated appropriately. We use the proportional odds model, which is the most popular for ordinal responses, and the generalised estimating equations (GEE) method to analyse repeated measurements. Although there are several ways to analyse repeated categorical responses, this thesis only demonstrates the marginal approach using the GEE method. By fitting proportional odds models, we evaluate whether student’s English Language test result associated with the questions are at the same level within each strategy. Results show that the English Language test result effects for the questions associated with Self-initiation, Planning, Monitoring and Evaluating, Prediction and Utilisation strategies are similar. On the other hand, the effects for the questions associated with Perceptual processing, Inferencing and Socio-affective strategies are significantly different. We also use a simulation study to show that when the ordinal response is treated as continuous, ordinary least square regression might have misleading results.</p>

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
◽  
Young-Min Kwon

<p>This thesis illustrates statistical methodology for identifying the effects of explanatory variables, for the response variables with an ordinal nature. The dataset applied to this methodology is a Listening Strategy dataset collected by The Language Learner Strategy Team at the National Institute of Education from Singapore. In this dataset, eight strategies were formed from 38 questions based on Linguistic theory. The core objective of this thesis is to validate whether 38 questions were aggregated appropriately. We use the proportional odds model, which is the most popular for ordinal responses, and the generalised estimating equations (GEE) method to analyse repeated measurements. Although there are several ways to analyse repeated categorical responses, this thesis only demonstrates the marginal approach using the GEE method. By fitting proportional odds models, we evaluate whether student’s English Language test result associated with the questions are at the same level within each strategy. Results show that the English Language test result effects for the questions associated with Self-initiation, Planning, Monitoring and Evaluating, Prediction and Utilisation strategies are similar. On the other hand, the effects for the questions associated with Perceptual processing, Inferencing and Socio-affective strategies are significantly different. We also use a simulation study to show that when the ordinal response is treated as continuous, ordinary least square regression might have misleading results.</p>


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
◽  
Stacey Dobbie

<p>This thesis presents a comparison of statistical methodologies for cluster verification on ordinal response variables. Methodologies will be applied to a Listening Strategy dataset collected by the Language Learner Strategies research team at the National Institute of Education in Singapore. From this listening dataset, eight clusters suggested by Linguistics theory require verification. The methodologies undertaken is to find which listening strategies have been formed well.  Methods used includes the proportional odds model, confirmatory factor analysis and ordinal agreement model. The proportional odds model is used to establish how well each cluster of questions is built. This is established by checking how similar questions within clusters are. The confirmatory factor analysis is used to verify how well the overall listening clusters have been built. This will be compared to clusters proposed by a statistical method. Lastly, the ordinal agreement model is applied to see how much agreement there is within each of the listening clusters. This will be able to show us which clusters is built better than the other clusters for this listening questionnaire.  Results show that the prediction listening strategy has the highest level of agreement as well as no difference between questions within this cluster. The Socio-affective listening strategy has the lowest level of agreement and very strong evidence of a difference between questions within the cluster. This suggests that the prediction cluster has been formed better than the Socio-affective cluster.</p>


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
◽  
Stacey Dobbie

<p>This thesis presents a comparison of statistical methodologies for cluster verification on ordinal response variables. Methodologies will be applied to a Listening Strategy dataset collected by the Language Learner Strategies research team at the National Institute of Education in Singapore. From this listening dataset, eight clusters suggested by Linguistics theory require verification. The methodologies undertaken is to find which listening strategies have been formed well.  Methods used includes the proportional odds model, confirmatory factor analysis and ordinal agreement model. The proportional odds model is used to establish how well each cluster of questions is built. This is established by checking how similar questions within clusters are. The confirmatory factor analysis is used to verify how well the overall listening clusters have been built. This will be compared to clusters proposed by a statistical method. Lastly, the ordinal agreement model is applied to see how much agreement there is within each of the listening clusters. This will be able to show us which clusters is built better than the other clusters for this listening questionnaire.  Results show that the prediction listening strategy has the highest level of agreement as well as no difference between questions within this cluster. The Socio-affective listening strategy has the lowest level of agreement and very strong evidence of a difference between questions within the cluster. This suggests that the prediction cluster has been formed better than the Socio-affective cluster.</p>


ASHA Leader ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 18 (3) ◽  
pp. 64-65
Author(s):  
King Kwok

A graduate student who is an English-language learner devises strategies to meet the challenges of providing speech-language treatment.


Science Scope ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 038 (9) ◽  
Author(s):  
Deborah Goldfisher ◽  
Barbara Crawford ◽  
Daniel Capps ◽  
Robert Ross

2012 ◽  
Vol 44 (3) ◽  
pp. 300-338 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kathryn Ciechanowski

This article provides micro analysis of one representative incident from a larger qualitative study to examine how third-grade bilingual students and their teacher negotiated academic disciplinary and popular culture discourses in a social studies unit on Jamestown and Pocahontas. Informed by discourse and linguistic analyses, this study explores the competing dominant and nondominant discourses as they intersected and overlapped in the complex literacy practices in this classroom. Ms. Montclair’s instruction was shaped by the textbook’s approach to social studies and accountability pressures of testing and content coverage. Yet the students drew from everyday popular resources in their thinking, taking up nonacademic discourses to understand content. This research explores the following questions: (a) What are the predominant discourses evident in the official curricular text and teacher’s enactment of it? (b) What are the discourses evident in children’s everyday resources drawn on to make sense of the school text? (c) How do specific linguistic features make possible these discourses and perspectives? Findings demonstrate that students navigated across multiple discourses that were different but represented dominant culture. As discourses intersected in class, participants provided a level of critical analyses but did not deeply take up nondominant perspectives despite their own positioning from linguistically and culturally nondominant backgrounds. By showing the complexity of literate and discursive practice, this article contributes to understandings of how bilingual and English language learner students confront the demands of academic disciplinary language, draw on their own resources to make sense of content, and require explicit instruction on language and social justice.


2020 ◽  
Vol 24 (1) ◽  
pp. 2156759X2097956
Author(s):  
Adonay A. Montes ◽  
Erika Ramos

The purpose of this study was to explore the impact of an 8-week academic navigational capital group with English language learner (ELL) students. Minimal research exists examining ELL students’ acquisition of navigational capital skills (skills needed to navigate and succeed in academic settings) in school. We used a pre- and postintervention survey to measure the impact of the group. Results showed growth in the academic navigational capital skills of all participants. Such increases represent a starting blueprint to consider when working with ELL students.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document