Computer-aided detection system applied to full-field digital mammograms

2010 ◽  
Vol 51 (10) ◽  
pp. 1086-1092 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alfonso Vega Bolivar ◽  
Sonia Sánchez Gomez ◽  
Paula Merino ◽  
Pilar Alonso-Bartolomé ◽  
Estrella Ortega Garcia ◽  
...  
Radiology ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 244 (1) ◽  
pp. 104-111 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sang Kyu Yang ◽  
Woo Kyung Moon ◽  
Nariya Cho ◽  
Jeong Seon Park ◽  
Joo Hee Cha ◽  
...  

2010 ◽  
Vol 61 (3) ◽  
pp. 162-169 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anabel M. Scaranelo ◽  
Pavel Crystal ◽  
Karina Bukhanov ◽  
Thomas H. Helbich

Purpose The purpose of this study was to evaluate the sensitivity of a direct computer-aided detection (CAD) system (d-CAD) in full-field digital mammography (FFDM) for the detection of microcalcifications not associated with mass or architectural distortion. Materials and Methods A database search of 1063 consecutive stereotactic core biopsies performed between 2002 and 2005 identified 196 patients with Breast Imaging-Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) 4 and 5 microcalcifications not associated with mass or distortion detected exclusively by bilateral FFDM. A commercially available CAD system (Second Look, version 7.2) was retrospectively applied to the craniocaudal and mediolateral oblique views in these patients (mean age, 59 years; range, 35–84 years). Breast density, location and mammographic size of the lesion, distribution, and tumour histology were recorded and analysed by using χ2, Fisher exact, or McNemar tests, when applicable. Results When using d-CAD, 71 of 74 malignant microcalcification cases (96%) and 101 of 122 benign microcalcifications (83%) were identified. There was a significant difference ( P < .05) between CAD sensitivity on the craniocaudal view, 91% (68 of 75), vs CAD sensitivity on the mediolateral oblique view, 80% (60 of 75). The d-CAD sensitivity for dense breast tissue (American College of Radiology [ACR] density 3 and 4) was higher (97%) than d-CAD sensitivity (95%) for nondense tissue (ACR density 1 and 2), but the difference was not statically significant. All 28 malignant calcifications larger than 10 mm were detected by CAD, whereas the sensitivity for lesions small than or equal to 10 mm was 94%. Conclusions D-CAD had a high sensitivity in the depiction of asymptomatic breast cancers, which were seen as microcalcifications on FFDM screening, with a sensitivity of d-CAD on the craniocaudal view being significantly better. All malignant microcalcifications larger than 10 mm were detected by d-CAD.


Radiology ◽  
2005 ◽  
Vol 235 (2) ◽  
pp. 385-390 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jay A. Baker ◽  
Eric L. Rosen ◽  
Michele M. Crockett ◽  
Joseph Y. Lo

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document