scholarly journals Cement-in-cement stem revision for Vancouver type B periprosthetic femoral fractures after total hip arthroplasty

2009 ◽  
Vol 80 (5) ◽  
pp. 548-552 ◽  
Author(s):  
Toby W Briant-Evans ◽  
Darmaraja Veeramootoo ◽  
Eleftherios Tsiridis ◽  
Matthew J Hubble
Keyword(s):  
Total Hip Arthroplasty ◽  
Hip Arthroplasty ◽  
Femoral Fractures ◽  
Type B ◽  
Total Hip ◽  
Stem Revision ◽  
Periprosthetic Femoral Fractures

scholarly journals Treatment of periprosthetic femoral fractures following total hip arthroplasty: results of an online survey of the European Hip Society

2021 ◽  
pp. 112070002110171
Author(s):  
Martin Thaler ◽  
Carmen Weiss ◽  
Ricarda Lechner ◽  
Jean-Alain Epinette ◽  
Theofilos S Karachalios ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Total Hip Arthroplasty ◽  
Hip Arthroplasty ◽  
Online Survey ◽  
Weight Bearing ◽  
Surgical Techniques ◽  
Femoral Fractures ◽  
Postoperative Treatment ◽  
Total Hip ◽  
Stem Revision ◽  
Periprosthetic Femoral Fractures

Background: Periprosthetic femoral fractures (PPF) are a devastating complication after total hip arthroplasty (THA). Both trauma and adult reconstruction surgeons or combined teams treat these fractures following management algorithms. The aim of this study is to investigate the current treatment of PPF by members of the European Hip Society (EHS). Methods: An online survey of the members of the European Hip Society (EHS) was conducted. 20 cases of periprosthetic fracture were presented and surgeons were asked to answer questions regarding classification, treatment and postoperative treatment protocol. Results: A total of 132 (130 male; 2 female) EHS members responded. Mean years in surgical practice was 18.8 (min. 1 year; max. 50 years). The preferred surgical method was combined open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) (30.3%) for AG fractures, ORIF with cables (30.4%) for AL fractures, combined ORIF (cable and plate) for B1 fractures (49.2%), stem revision with cables for B2 fractures (73.1%), stem revision with cables for B3 (55.9%) fractures and combined ORIF (cable and plate: 55.5%) for C fractures. Surprisingly, 10.8% suggested various stem revision techniques for B1 and 17.4% for C fractures. Strong variations were observed regarding postoperative weight-bearing protocol. Conclusions: A strong consensus was found for the choice of conservative or surgical treatment of the different PPF types according to the Vancouver Classification. Various stem revision techniques were the preferred surgical techniques for Vancouver B2 (91.2%) and B3 (88.6%) fractures. However, for postoperative weight-bearing, when the ORIF technique was used, a significant variation of protocols was found.

The Treatment of Periprosthetic Femoral Fractures After Total Hip Arthroplasty

JBJS Reviews ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 2 (8) ◽  
Author(s):  
Peter N. Misur ◽  
Clive P. Duncan ◽  
Bassam A. Masri
Keyword(s):  
Total Hip Arthroplasty ◽  
Hip Arthroplasty ◽  
Femoral Fractures ◽  
Total Hip ◽  
Periprosthetic Femoral Fractures

scholarly journals Patient and implant survival following intraoperative periprosthetic femoral fractures during primary total hip arthroplasty

2019 ◽  
Vol 101-B (10) ◽  
pp. 1199-1208 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jonathan N. Lamb ◽  
Gulraj S. Matharu ◽  
Anthony Redmond ◽  
Andrew Judge ◽  
Robert M. West ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Total Hip Arthroplasty ◽  
Hip Arthroplasty ◽  
Revision Surgery ◽  
Cox Regression ◽  
Patient Survival ◽  
Femoral Fractures ◽  
Trochanteric Fracture ◽  
Total Hip ◽  
Periprosthetic Femoral Fractures ◽  
Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty

Aims We compared implant and patient survival following intraoperative periprosthetic femoral fractures (IOPFFs) during primary total hip arthroplasty (THA) with matched controls. Patients and Methods This retrospective cohort study compared 4831 hips with IOPFF and 48 154 propensity score matched primary THAs without IOPFF implanted between 2004 and 2016, which had been recorded on a national joint registry. Implant and patient survival rates were compared between groups using Cox regression. Results Ten-year stem survival was worse in the IOPFF group (p < 0.001). Risk of revision for aseptic loosening increased 7.2-fold following shaft fracture and almost 2.8-fold after trochanteric fracture (p < 0.001). Risk of periprosthetic fracture of the femur revision increased 4.3-fold following calcar-crack and 3.6-fold after trochanteric fracture (p < 0.01). Risk of instability revision was 3.6-fold after trochanteric fracture and 2.4-fold after calcar crack (p < 0.001). Risk of 90-day mortality following IOPFF without revision was 1.7-fold and 4.0-fold after IOPFF with early revision surgery versus uncomplicated THA (p < 0.001). Conclusion IOPFF increases risk of stem revision and mortality up to ten years following surgery. The risk of revision depends on IOPFF subtype and mortality risk increases with subsequent revision surgery. Surgeons should carefully diagnose and treat IOPFF to minimize fracture progression and implant failure. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2019;101-B:1199–1208

Periprosthetic Femoral Fractures in Total Hip Arthroplasty

2008 ◽  
Vol 20 (4) ◽  
pp. 235
Author(s):  
Yi-Suk Kim ◽  
Young-Ho Kim
Keyword(s):  
Total Hip Arthroplasty ◽  
Hip Arthroplasty ◽  
Femoral Fractures ◽  
Total Hip ◽  
Periprosthetic Femoral Fractures

Periprosthetic Femoral Fractures in Total Hip Arthroplasty

2014 ◽  
Vol 24 (6) ◽  
pp. 556-567 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nicholas E. Ohly ◽  
Michael R. Whitehouse ◽  
Clive P. Duncan
Keyword(s):  
Total Hip Arthroplasty ◽  
Hip Arthroplasty ◽  
Femoral Fractures ◽  
Total Hip ◽  
Periprosthetic Femoral Fractures

scholarly journals Intraoperative periprosthetic femoral fractures at total hip arthroplasty. Review of classifications and treatment techniques

2019 ◽  
Vol 26 (2) ◽  
pp. 67-72
Author(s):  
E. V Polevoy ◽  
N. V Zagorodniy ◽  
S. V Kagramanov ◽  
G. A Chragyan ◽  
O. A Aleksanyan
Keyword(s):  
Surgical Treatment ◽  
Total Hip Arthroplasty ◽  
Hip Arthroplasty ◽  
Femoral Fractures ◽  
Treatment Technique ◽  
Total Hip ◽  
Treatment Techniques ◽  
Periprosthetic Femoral Fractures ◽  
Classification And Treatment

The review covers the problem of intraoperative periprosthetic femoral fractures at total hip arthroplasty including the causes, classification and treatment techniques. This complication may occur at any step of the intervention, may differ by localization and pattern. All these will determine the preferable surgical treatment technique.

Periprosthetic femoral fractures after total hip arthroplasty: An algorithm of treatment

Injury ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 50 ◽  
pp. S45-S51 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vito Pavone ◽  
Claudia de Cristo ◽  
Antonio Di Stefano ◽  
Luciano Costarella ◽  
Gianluca Testa ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Total Hip Arthroplasty ◽  
Hip Arthroplasty ◽  
Femoral Fractures ◽  
Total Hip ◽  
Periprosthetic Femoral Fractures
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document