Orthodontic Treatment with Distraction Osteogenesis for a Skeletal Class III Patient with Unilateral Cleft Lip and Palate: A Case Report

2021 ◽  
Vol 24 (2) ◽  
pp. 84-95
Author(s):  
Seung-Weon Lim ◽  
Hyun-Hee Choo ◽  
Hyeon-Shik Hwang ◽  
Jin-Hyoung Cho ◽  
Kyungmin Clara Lee
Keyword(s):  
Case Report ◽  
Distraction Osteogenesis ◽  
Orthodontic Treatment ◽  
Cleft Lip ◽  
Cleft Lip And Palate ◽  
Class Iii ◽  
Skeletal Class

Multidisciplinary Approach for Treating Malocclusion of Patient With Basal Cell Nevus Syndrome: A Case Report

2019 ◽  
Vol 57 (2) ◽  
pp. 255-262
Author(s):  
Sayuri Inoue ◽  
Hiroshi Kurosaka ◽  
Donghoon Lee ◽  
Takashi Yamashiro
Keyword(s):  
Basal Cell ◽  
Orthodontic Treatment ◽  
Cleft Lip ◽  
Multidisciplinary Approach ◽  
Genetic Disorder ◽  
Dental Arch ◽  
Class Iii ◽  
Basal Cell Nevus Syndrome ◽  
Skeletal Class ◽  
Craniofacial Features

Basal cell nevus syndrome (BCNS) is a rare genetic disorder that can be caused by mutation of multiple genes, including PTCH1, PTCH2, and SUFU, in an autosomal dominant manner. The symptoms include some craniofacial features such as keratocystic odontogenic tumors (KCOTs), macrocephaly, and cleft lip and/or palate. Although comprehensive orthodontic treatment is frequently required for some of these craniofacial deformities, there are few reports that show the outcomes of comprehensive orthodontic treatment. Here, we report a case of BCNS with multiple KCOTs, macrocephaly, skeletal class III malocclusion, asymmetric dental arch, and mandibular crowding, which was successfully treated with comprehensive orthodontic treatment.

Upper Airway 3D Changes of Patients With Cleft Lip and Palate After Orthognathic Surgery

2018 ◽  
Vol 56 (3) ◽  
pp. 314-320 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marilia Sayako Yatabe-Ioshida ◽  
Letícia Dominguez Campos ◽  
Renato Yassukata Yaedu ◽  
Ivy Kiemle Trindade-Suedam
Keyword(s):  
Orthognathic Surgery ◽  
Cleft Lip ◽  
Cleft Lip And Palate ◽  
Upper Airway ◽  
Cross Sectional Area ◽  
Sectional Area ◽  
Class Iii ◽  
Linear Measurements ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Skeletal Class

Objectives: The purpose of this study was to 3-dimensionally assess the airway characteristics of patients with unilateral cleft lip and palate (UCLP) and bilateral cleft lip and palate (BCLP) who underwent orthognathic surgery. Design: This was a retrospective study. Setting: The study took place at a national referral center for cleft lip and palate rehabilitation. Patients and Participants: The sample comprised cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) scans obtained before and after orthognathic surgery of 15 individuals (30 CBCT scans), divided into 2 groups: UCLP group (n = 9 patients/18 CBCT scans) and BCLP group (n = 6/12 CBCT scans). All patients had a nonsyndromic UCLP or BCLP and a skeletal class III malocclusion at the preoperative period. Interventions: Airway volume, pharyngeal minimal cross-sectional area (mCSA), location of mCSA, sella-nasion-A point (SNA) and sella-nasion-B point (SNB) angles, and condylion-A point and condyloid-gnathion linear measurements were assessed in open-source software (ITK-SNAP and SlicerCMF). Main Outcome Measure: Airway dimensions of patients with UCLP and BCLP increase after orthognathic surgery. Results: After orthognathic surgery, UCLP group showed a significant 20% increase in nasopharynx volume. Although not significant, BCLP group also showed an increase of 18% in the same region. Minimal cross-sectional area remained dimensionally stable after surgery and was all located in the oropharynx region, on both groups. Additionally, a positive correlation was observed between volume and mCSA on both groups. Conclusion: Overall, individuals with UCLP and BCLP showed an increase in the upper airway after orthognathic surgery and this might explain the breathing and sleep improvements reported by the patients after the surgery.

Quality of Life and Temporomandibular Disorders in Patients With Skeletal Class III Malocclusion With Cleft Lip and Palate

2021 ◽  
pp. 105566562110434
Author(s):  
Bernardo Olsson ◽  
Isabela Polesi Bergamaschi ◽  
Erika Calvano Küchler ◽  
Aline Monise Sebastiani ◽  
Guilherme dos Santos Trento ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Temporomandibular Disorders ◽  
Psychological Factors ◽  
Cleft Lip ◽  
Cleft Lip And Palate ◽  
Class Iii ◽  
Class Iii Malocclusion ◽  
Skeletal Class ◽  
Better Than

Objective The aim of the study was to assess the quality of life (QOL), oral health-related QOL (OHRQOL), temporomandibular disorders (TMDs), and psychological factors in patients with skeletal Class III malocclusion with cleft lip and palate (CLP) and without CLP. Design Case–control. Setting Primary care, institutional practice. Patients One hundred thirty-six patients with skeletal Class III malocclusion with CLP (n = 68) and without CLP (n = 68). Main outcome measures QOL and OHRQOL were assessed using the World Health Organization Quality of Life-BREF (WHOQOL-BREF) questionnaire and the Oral Health Impact Profile-14 questionnaire, respectively. TMDs and psychological factors were assessed using the Research Diagnostic Criteria for TMD (RDC/TMD). Results No differences in QOL were found between the groups ( P >  0.05). Patients with CLP reported a better OHRQOL ( P = 0.025) in the physical pain, physical disability, and psychological disability domains ( P <  0.05). Patients with CLP presented with less myofascial pain (OR, 0.28; 95% CI, 0.11-0.71] and other articular conditions (OR 0.24; 95% CI 0.06-0.90]. More patients with CLP reported no chronic pain ( P = 0.012). The QOL of patients with CLP with no depression or with no nonspecific physical symptoms including pain (NSPSIP) was better than that of patients without CLP. The OHRQOL of patients with CLP without TMDs or no psychological factors was better than that of patients without CLP. Conclusions Patients with skeletal Class III malocclusion who require orthognathic surgery with CLP have better OHRQOL and present with fewer TMDs than those patients without CLP.

Orthodontic-Surgical Approach for Treating Skeletal Class III Malocclusion With Severe Maxillary Deficiency in Isolated Cleft Palate

2018 ◽  
Vol 56 (3) ◽  
pp. 400-407 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kohei Nakatsugawa ◽  
Hiroshi Kurosaka ◽  
Kiyomi Mihara ◽  
Susumu Tanaka ◽  
Tomonao Aikawa ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cleft Palate ◽  
Surgical Approach ◽  
Orthodontic Treatment ◽  
Cleft Lip ◽  
Cleft Lip And Palate ◽  
Class Iii ◽  
Maxillary Expansion ◽  
Rapid Palatal Expansion ◽  
Isolated Cleft Palate ◽  
Maxillary Deficiency

Orthodontic treatment in patients with orofacial cleft such as cleft lip and palate or isolated cleft palate is challenging, especially when the patients exhibit severe maxillary growth retardation. To correct this deficiency, maxillary expansion and protraction can be performed in the first phase of orthodontic treatment. However, in some cases, the malocclusion cannot be corrected by these procedures, and thus, skeletal discrepancy remains when the patients are adolescents. These remaining problems occasionally require various orthognathic treatments according to the degree of the discrepancy. Here, we describe one case of a female with isolated cleft palate and hand malformation who exhibited severe maxillary deficiency until her adolescence and was treated with multiple orthognathic surgeries, including surgically assisted maxillary expansion (surgically assisted rapid palatal expansion), LeFort I osteotomy, and bilateral sagittal split osteotomy in order to correct severe skeletal discrepancy and malocclusion. The treatment resulted in balanced facial appearance and mutually protected occlusion with good stability. The purpose of this case report is to show the orthodontic treatment outcome of 1 patient who exhibited isolated cleft palate and subsequent severe skeletal deformities and malocclusion which was treated by an orthodontic-surgical approach.

A Case Report of Multidisciplinary Treatment of an Adult Patient with Bilateral Cleft Lip and Palate

2014 ◽  
Vol 51 (6) ◽  
pp. 711-721 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tomohiro Fukunaga ◽  
Tadashi Honjo ◽  
Yuichi Sakai ◽  
Kiyo Sasaki ◽  
Teruko Takano-Yamamoto ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Case Report ◽  
Adult Patient ◽  
Bone Grafting ◽  
Orthodontic Treatment ◽  
Cleft Lip ◽  
Cleft Lip And Palate ◽  
Multidisciplinary Treatment ◽  
Retention Period ◽  
Bilateral Cleft Lip ◽  
Palate Patient

This is a case report about the successful orthodontic treatment of a bilateral cleft lip and palate patient by using a combination of bone grafting and subsequent prosthodontic rehabilitation. An adult patient with a bilateral cleft lip and palate presented with a concave profile, anterior and lateral crossbite, a markedly deep overbite, and residual bilateral alveolar clefts. His jaw movement patterns were unstable and irregular due to his collapsed bite. Orthodontic treatment with bilateral bone grafting improved his concave profile by downward and backward rotation of the mandible within the freeway space, and optimum occlusion and functionally stable and smooth jaw movements were obtained. After a 6-year retention period, no skeletal relapse could be detected, and his occlusal stability was satisfactory.

scholarly journals Presurgical orthodontic treatment of patients with complete bilateral cleft lip and palate

2014 ◽  
Vol 71 (7) ◽  
pp. 693-699 ◽  
Author(s):  
Julija Radojicic ◽  
Tatjana Tanic ◽  
Nebojsa Jovic ◽  
Tatjana Cutovic ◽  
Konstantinos Papadopoulos
Keyword(s):  
Case Report ◽  
Surgical Management ◽  
Orthodontic Treatment ◽  
Cleft Lip ◽  
Cleft Lip And Palate ◽  
Multiple Role ◽  
Progressive Reduction ◽  
Secondary Palate ◽  
Bilateral Cleft Lip ◽  
Orthodontic Device

Introduction. Cleft lips and palates are the most common congenital orofacial anomaly. This type of clefts is the most severe from the orthodontic-surgical therapy aspect. Case report. A female newborn with a complete cleft of the primary and the secondary palate was admitted to the clinic, where a multiple-role orthodontic device was specially designed and applied to primarily manage the closure of the existing cleft and help to improve the suckling ability of the baby. Besides the fact that it allows breastfeeding, it has a significant orthodontic effect, too. Conclusion. Specificity of this device is the lack of extraoral fixation. What can easily be observed is a progressive reduction of the cleft between the separated segments and the premaxilla retrusion. It, thus, allows the creation of much better conditions for further surgical management of the said defect.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document