scholarly journals Problem Difficulty in Arithmetic Cognition: Humans and Connectionist Models

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sungjae Cho ◽  
Jaeseo Lim ◽  
Chris Hickey ◽  
Byoung-Tak Zhang

In mathematical cognition, problem difficulty is a central variable. In the present study, problem difficulty was operationalized through five arithmetic operators --- addition, subtraction, multiplication, division, and modulo --- and through the number of carries required to correctly solve a problem. The present study collected data from human participants solving arithmetic problems, and from multilayer perceptrons (MLPs) that learn arithmetic problems. Binary numeral problems were chosen in order to minimize other criteria that may affect problem difficulty, such as problem familiarity and the problem size effect. In both humans and MLPs, problem difficulty was highest for multiplication, followed by modulo and then subtraction. The human study found that problem difficulty was monotonically increasing with respect to the number of carries, across all five operators. Furthermore, a strict increase was also observed for addition in the MLP study.

2021 ◽  
Vol 168 ◽  
pp. S156
Author(s):  
Yuniel Romero Quintana ◽  
Johanna Pérez Hidalgo-Gato ◽  
Nancy Estévez Pérez ◽  
Eduardo Martínez-Montes ◽  
Rosario Torres Díaz

2010 ◽  
Vol 32 (1) ◽  
pp. 51-59 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kerstin Jost ◽  
Patrick H. Khader ◽  
Michael Burke ◽  
Siegfried Bien ◽  
Frank Rösler

2015 ◽  
Vol 18 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Isabel Núñez-Peña ◽  
Angels Colomé ◽  
Elisabet Tubau

AbstractThe aim of this study was to examine whether differences in strategy selection and/or strategy efficiency can explain the modulation of the problem-size effect by arithmetic skill. More specifically, we wondered whether arithmetic skill increases the use of retrieval strategy in large problems, and/or enhances the efficiency of either retrieval or procedural strategies. The performance of highly-skilled (HS) and less highly-skilled (LS) individuals on a subtraction verification task was analyzed according to problem size and to the strategy reported on a trial-by-trial basis after each problem. The problem size effect was larger for LS individuals than for their HS peers, both in response time and in hit rate. Nevertheless, groups did not differ regarding the strategy reported for each subtraction size. As expected, problems in which retrieval strategy was reported were solved more quickly and more accurately than problems solved by procedural strategies. Responses using retrieval strategy were equally fast in the two groups, but HS individuals performed better than LS when using procedural strategies. The results therefore suggest that the differences in behavioral measures between groups might specifically be due to differences in the efficiency of procedural strategies.


Author(s):  
Jérôme Prado ◽  
Jiayan Lu ◽  
Li Liu ◽  
Qi Dong ◽  
Xinlin Zhou ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document