scholarly journals RESEARCH ON ACCEPTABLE LUMINANCE CONTRAST BETWEEN THE WINDOW AND THE SURROUNDING WALL (Part 1) : EXAMINATION OF WINDOWS INSTALLED AT WAIST HEIGHT INCLUDING BLINDS

2021 ◽  
Vol 86 (790) ◽  
pp. 883-891
Author(s):  
Mika KATO ◽  
Nozomu YOSHIZAWA ◽  
Hideki YAMAGUCHI ◽  
Yasuhiro MIKI
Keyword(s):  
2018 ◽  
Vol 30 (10) ◽  
pp. 1925
Author(s):  
Xumin Cao ◽  
Chunxiao Liu ◽  
Jindong Zhang ◽  
Yuhang Lin ◽  
Jinwei Zhao

2021 ◽  
pp. 147715352098226
Author(s):  
X Cai ◽  
L Quan ◽  
J Wu ◽  
Y He

Fill light, used to helps cameras capture road traffic conditions at night, can lead to serious visual consequences for drivers. Research on disability glare from LED fill light is scarce and therefore this study explored strategies for controlling disability glare of constant-light LED traffic monitoring fill light. The threshold increment was used as an index to evaluate disability glare. The effective disability glare area of LED traffic monitoring fill light was determined based on high dynamic range technology. According to visual efficacy theory, there is a relationship between disability glare conditions and reaction times. The influencing factors include background luminance, luminance contrast and fill light luminance. The results showed that disability glare was the most intense in a range of 20 m to 30 m in front of LED fill light. To reduce the effect of disability glare on drivers, luminance contrast between small targets and the road surface should be greater than 0.5. The fill light luminance should not be greater than 100,000 cd/m2.


Author(s):  
John J. Sloper ◽  
Alison R. Davis ◽  
Majella M. Neveu ◽  
Chris R. Hogg ◽  
Michael J. Morgan ◽  
...  

1996 ◽  
Vol 4 (3) ◽  
pp. 135 ◽  
Author(s):  
G. P. J. penkelink ◽  
J. Besuijen
Keyword(s):  

2006 ◽  
Vol 23 (3-4) ◽  
pp. 597-601 ◽  
Author(s):  
MARIS OZOLINSH ◽  
MICHÉLE COLOMB ◽  
GATIS IKAUNIEKS ◽  
VARIS KARITANS

Perception of different color contrast stimuli was studied in the presence of light scattering: in a fog chamber in Clermont-Ferrand and in laboratory conditions where light scattering of similar levels was obtained, using different light scattering eye occluders. Blue (shortest wavelength) light is scattered in fog to the greatest extent, causing deterioration of vision quality especially for the monochromatic blue stimuli. However, for the color stimuli presented on a white background, visual acuity in fog for blue Landolt-C optotypes was higher than for red and green optotypes on the white background. The luminance of color Landolt-C optotypes presented on a LCD screen was chosen corresponding to the blue, green, and red color contributions in achromatic white stimuli (computer digital R, G, or B values for chromatic stimuli equal to RGB values in the achromatic white background) that results in the greatest luminance contrast for the white–blue stimuli, thus advancing the visual acuity for the white-blue stimuli. Besides such blue stimuli on the white background are displayed with a uniform, spatially unmodulated distribution of the screen blue phosphor emission over the entire area of the screen including the stimulus C optotype area. It follows that scattering, which has the greatest effect on the blue component of screen luminance, has the least effect on the perception of white–blue stimuli.


1968 ◽  
Vol 27 (1) ◽  
pp. 287-291 ◽  
Author(s):  
June Adam ◽  
Marion Ring

An experiment was designed to investigate the possibility of interactions between luminance contrast factors and temporal factors in determining the magnitude of the concentric-circles aftereffect. 24 combinations of inducing figure exposure time, condition of test figure presentation (determined by test figure exposure time and interstimulus interval), inducing figure luminance contrast and test-figure luminance contrast, were used. No interactions were found.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document