Fracture Table vs. Lateral Positioning for Intramedullary Fixation of Femur Fractures

Author(s):  
2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniel Axelrod ◽  
Herman Johal ◽  
Kim Madden ◽  
Francesc Marcano ◽  
Carlos Prada

Background: Femoral Shaft fractures are devastating and life threatening injuries. Femoral shaft fractures are most commonly treated with intramedullary fixation. Malrotation of the injured limb after fixation is a common and significant complication following femoral shaft fractures. During the operation, patients can be positioned either supine or in a lateral position. Additionally, patients can be placed on a standard radiolucent operating room table, or placed on a fracture table with traction statically applied to the operative limb throughout the case. Previous case series and cohort studies have shown equivalence between study groups, but choice between positioning options remains controversial. Methods: This represents a protocol for a randomized controlled pilot trial. We will be compared lateral positioning with use of manual traction to supine positioning with use of a fracture table. Primary outcomes will be in assessment for feasibility for a future full scale randomized trial, including evaluating patient recruitment, patient compliance with followup, contamination between treatment arms and others. Results: The primary outcome will be feasibility for a future trial. Secondary outcomes will include malrotation as measured through postoperative computed tomography scans and gait analysis at 6 months.


2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniel Axelrod ◽  
Herman Johal ◽  
Kim Madden ◽  
Francesc Marcano ◽  
Carlos Prada

Background: Femoral Shaft fractures are devastating and life threatening injuries. Femoral shaft fractures are most commonly treated with intramedullary fixation. Malrotation of the injured limb after fixation is a common and significant complication following femoral shaft fractures. During the operation, patients can be positioned either supine or in a lateral position. Additionally, patients can be placed on a standard radiolucent operating room table, or placed on a fracture table with traction statically applied to the operative limb throughout the case. Previous case series and cohort studies have shown equivalence between study groups, but choice between positioning options remains controversial. Methods: This represents a protocol for a randomized controlled pilot trial. We will be compared lateral positioning with use of manual traction to supine positioning with use of a fracture table. Primary outcomes will be in assessment for feasibility for a future full scale randomized trial, including evaluating patient recruitment, patient compliance with followup, contamination between treatment arms and others. Results: The primary outcome will be feasibility for a future trial. Secondary outcomes will include malrotation as measured through postoperative computed tomography scans and gait analysis at 6 months.


2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniel Axelrod ◽  
Herman Johal ◽  
Kim Madden ◽  
Francesc Marcano ◽  
Carlos Prada

Background: Femoral Shaft fractures are devastating and life threatening injuries. Femoral shaft fractures are most commonly treated with intramedullary fixation. Malrotation of the injured limb after fixation is a common and significant complication following femoral shaft fractures. During the operation, patients can be positioned either supine or in a lateral position. Additionally, patients can be placed on a standard radiolucent operating room table, or placed on a fracture table with traction statically applied to the operative limb throughout the case. Previous case series and cohort studies have shown equivalence between study groups, but choice between positioning options remains controversial. Methods: This represents a protocol for a randomized controlled pilot trial. We will be compared lateral positioning with use of manual traction to supine positioning with use of a fracture table. Primary outcomes will be in assessment for feasibility for a future full scale randomized trial, including evaluating patient recruitment, patient compliance with followup, contamination between treatment arms and others. Results: The primary outcome will be feasibility for a future trial. Secondary outcomes will include malrotation as measured through intraoperative radiographs, postoperative computed tomography scans and gait analysis at 6 months.


2017 ◽  
Vol 37 (6) ◽  
pp. e353-e356
Author(s):  
Brian A. Kelly ◽  
Manahil Naqvi ◽  
Emily S. Rademacher ◽  
Patricia E. Miller ◽  
Daniel J. Hedequist ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 37 (5) ◽  
pp. 299-304 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jason M. Cage ◽  
Sheena R. Black ◽  
Robert L. Wimberly ◽  
Jay B. Cook ◽  
William T. Gheen ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 2016 ◽  
pp. 1-3
Author(s):  
Carlo Montoli ◽  
Cecilia Pasquali ◽  
Elia Paiusco ◽  
Vincenzo Pellecchia ◽  
Ettore Vulcano

Intertrochanteric femur fractures are commonly observed in the elderly and may be associated with a complete fracture of the lesser trochanter in over 50% of cases. The migration of the lesser trochanter secondary to the psoas muscle contracture is a rare event. This case report presents a rare case of sudden groin pain three-week status after intramedullary fixation of a intertrochanteric femur fracture.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document