scholarly journals Percutaneous transluminal angioplasty and stenting for recurrent carotid artery stenosis

1998 ◽  
Vol 5 (6) ◽  
pp. E7
Author(s):  
Giuseppe Lanzino ◽  
Robert A. Mericle ◽  
Demetrius K. Lopes ◽  
Ajay K. Wakhloo ◽  
Lee R. Guterman ◽  
...  

Percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA) and stenting has recently been proposed as an alternative to surgical reexploration in patients with recurrent carotid artery stenosis following endarterectomy. The authors retrospectively reviewed their experience after performing 25 procedures in 21 patients to assess the safety and efficacy of PTA with or without stenting for carotid artery restenosis. The mean interval between endarterectomy and the endovascular procedure was 57 months (range 8-220 months). Seven arteries in five patients were treated by PTA alone (including bilateral procedures in one patient and repeated angioplasty in the same vessel in another). Early suboptimum results and recurrent stenosis in some of these initial cases prompted the authors to combine PTA with stenting in the treatment of 18 arteries over the past 3 years. No major periprocedural deficits (neurological or cardiac complications) or death occurred. There was one periprocedural transient neurological event. A pseudoaneurysm of the femoral artery (at the access site) required surgical repair. In the 16 patients who each underwent at least 6 months of follow-up review, no neurological events ipsilateral to the treated artery had occurred after a mean follow-up period of 27 months (range 6-57 months). Three of five patients who underwent PTA alone developed significant (> 50%) asymptomatic restenoses that required repeated angioplasty in one and PTA with stenting in two patients. Significant restenosis (55%) was observed in only one of the vessels treated by combined angioplasty with stenting. Endovascular PTA and stenting of recurrent carotid artery stenosis is both technically feasible and safe and has a satisfactory midterm patency. This procedure can be considered a viable alternative to surgical reexploration in patients with recurrent carotid artery stenosis.

1999 ◽  
Vol 90 (4) ◽  
pp. 688-694 ◽  
Author(s):  
Giuseppe Lanzino ◽  
Robert A. Mericle ◽  
Demetrius K. Lopes ◽  
Ajay K. Wakhloo ◽  
Lee R. Guterman ◽  
...  

Object. Treatment consisting of percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA) and stent placement has recently been proposed as an alternative to surgical reexploration in patients with recurrent carotid artery stenosis following endarterectomy. The authors retrospectively reviewed their experience after performing 25 procedures in 21 patients to assess the safety and efficacy of PTA with or without stent placement for carotid artery restenosis.Methods. The mean interval between endarterectomy and the endovascular procedures was 57 months (range 8–220 months). Seven arteries in five patients were treated by PTA alone (including bilateral procedures in one patient and repeated angioplasty in the same vessel in another). Early suboptimum results and recurrent stenosis in some of these initial cases prompted the authors to combine PTA with stent placement in the treatment of 18 arteries over the past 3 years. No major periprocedural deficits (neurological or cardiac complications) or death occurred. There was one periprocedural transient neurological event, and in one patient a pseudoaneurysm of the femoral artery (at the access site) required surgical repair. In the 16 patients who each underwent at least 6 months of follow-up review, no neurological events ipsilateral to the treated artery had occurred after a mean follow-up period of 27 months (range 6–57 months). Three of five patients who underwent PTA alone developed significant (> 50%) asymptomatic restenoses that required repeated angioplasty in one and PTA with stent placement in two patients. Significant restenosis (55%) was observed in only one of the vessels treated by combined angioplasty and stent placement.Conclusions. Endovascular PTA and stenting of recurrent carotid artery stenosis is both technically feasible and safe and has a satisfactory midterm patency. This procedure can be considered a viable alternative to surgical reexploration in patients with recurrent carotid artery stenosis.


1998 ◽  
Vol 4 (1_suppl) ◽  
pp. 37-40 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. Yoshimura ◽  
Y. Kaku ◽  
T. Ueda ◽  
K. Hayashi ◽  
Y. Nishimura ◽  
...  

Percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA) is currently performed as a therapeutic strategy for the management of the cervical carotid artery stenosis. In our clinic, PTA was performed successfully in all 24 patients initially. Restenosis was observed in 4 of 24 patients who received 3 to 6 month follow-up angiography. Repeated PTA was performed in 4 patients, 3 of whom were successfully treated, while severe wall dissection occurred in 1 patient. Furthermore, asymptomatic re-restenosis was noted in 1 of 4 patients who received repeated PTA. Dissection was noted in 5 of 28 procedures, which occurred more often in the patients with calcified or restenotic lesions. These results suggest that stenting or emergent surgery should be prepared in PTA of the carotid artery stenosis to avoid major complications, especially when the patients have calcified or restenotic lesions.


1995 ◽  
Vol 8 (6) ◽  
pp. 211-213
Author(s):  
J. Satomi ◽  
J. Moroi ◽  
M. Sasaki ◽  
M. Sawada ◽  
A. Suzuki ◽  
...  

We examined the patients with cervical carotid artery stenosis (>70%) treated by carotid artery angioplasty and stenting (CAS) as a first-choice direct revascularization therapy. The patients consisted of 45 men and seven women; their mean age was 70.4 years (range, 54–84 yr), with 60 cervical carotid stenosis (39 symptomatic and 21 asymptomatic). Sixty procedures resulted in successful stent deployment in 55 cases, percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA) only without stenting in three, and failed angioplasty due to inaccessibility in two. Morbidity was seen in three cases associated with thromboembolic complication. Instent restenosis was observed in one case, which was successfully treated with subsequent PTA. CAS seems reasonable treatment for cervical carotid artery stenosis, although further accumulation of the cases will be needed to evaluate the efficacy between CAS and carotid endarterectomy.


Nosotchu ◽  
1985 ◽  
Vol 7 (2) ◽  
pp. 142-149
Author(s):  
Nobumasa Kuwana ◽  
Yasuhiko Mochimatsu ◽  
Hideyo Fujino ◽  
Akihito Saito ◽  
Nobuaki Mashimo

2004 ◽  
Vol 10 (2_suppl) ◽  
pp. 27-30 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. Yoshimura

As treatment for cervical carotid artery stenosis, medical treatment, carotid endarterectomy (CEA), and percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA) with/without stenting are known. In this report, we review the history and current status of these treatments. Comparison between CEA and PTA/stenting is further discussed based on recent clinical reports and evidence.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document