Motor cortex stimulation for central pain and peripheral deafferentation pain

2000 ◽  
Vol 92 (1) ◽  
pp. 150-155 ◽  
Author(s):  
Youichi Saitoh ◽  
Masahiko Shibata ◽  
Shun-ichiro Hirano ◽  
Masayuki Hirata ◽  
Takashi Mashimo ◽  
...  

✓ The authors tested a modified motor cortex stimulation protocol for treatment of central and peripheral types of deafferentation pain. Four patients with thalamic pain and four with peripheral deafferentation pain were studied. Preoperative pharmacological tests of pain relief were performed using phentolamine, lidocaine, ketamine, thiopental, and placebo. In five patients we placed a 20- or 40-electrode grid in the subdural space to determine the best stimulation point for pain relief for a few weeks before definitive placement of a four-electrode array. In three patients, the four-electrode array was implanted in the interhemispheric fissure as a one-stage procedure to treat lower-extremity pain. In two patients with pain extending from the extremity to the trunk or hip, dual devices were implanted to drive two electrodes.Six of eight patients experienced pain reduction (two each with excellent, good, and fair relief) from motor cortex stimulation. No correlation was apparent between pharmacological test results and the effectiveness of motor cortex stimulation. Patients with peripheral deafferentation pain, including two with phantom-limb pain and two with brachial plexus injury, attained pain relief from motor cortex stimulation, with excellent results in two cases. Testing performed with a subdural multiple-electrode grid was helpful in locating the best stimulation point for pain relief. Motor cortex stimulation may be effective for treating peripheral as well as central deafferentation pain.

2001 ◽  
Vol 11 (3) ◽  
pp. 1-5 ◽  
Author(s):  
Youichi Saitoh ◽  
Shun-ichiro Hirano ◽  
Amami Kato ◽  
Haruhiko Kishima ◽  
Masayuki Hirata ◽  
...  

Object The authors tested a modified motor cortex stimulation (MCS) protocol for the treatment of deafferentation pain in 15 patients: eight patients with poststroke pain, four with brachial plexus injury, two with phantom limb pain, and one with spinal cord injury. Methods Preoperative pharmacological tests were performed with phentolamine, lidocaine, ketamine, thiopental, morphine, and a placebo. In 12 patients we placed a 20– or 40–grid electrode in the subdural space to determine the best stimulation point for pain relief over a few weeks and therefore the optimum position for a permanent internal device. In four patients, the MCS devices were implanted in the interhemispheric fissure to reduce lower-extremity pain. In one patient, the MCS device was placed within the central sulcus, and a 20-grid electrode was placed on the brain surface. In two patients with pain extending from the upper extremity to the hyperbody, dual-electrode devices were implanted to drive two electrodes. In 10 of the 15 patients MCS-induced pain reduction was achieved (four with excellent, two with good, and four with fair alleviation of pain). The result of pharmacological testing indicated that patients with ketamine sensitivity seem to be good candidates for MCS. Conclusions Test stimulation with a subdural multigrid electrode was helpful in locating the best stimulation point for pain relief.


1999 ◽  
Vol 91 (1) ◽  
pp. 121-123 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sergio Canavero ◽  
Vincenzo Bonicalzi ◽  
Giancarlo Castellano ◽  
Paola Perozzo ◽  
Barbara Massa-Micon

✓ In this report, the authors describe a case in which the patient began to experience a supernumerary phantom arm after she received motor cortex stimulation for central pain. The patient had a history of right thalamocapsular stroke. It is speculated that the motor cortex activation triggered a response in the patient's parietal lobe, precipitating perception of the phantom limb.To the authors' knowledge this is the first reported case of its kind.


2001 ◽  
Vol 77 (1-4) ◽  
pp. 172-176 ◽  
Author(s):  
J.Ch. Sol ◽  
J. Casaux ◽  
F.E. Roux ◽  
J.A. Lotterie ◽  
P. Bousquet ◽  
...  

2007 ◽  
Vol 58 ◽  
pp. S29
Author(s):  
Youichi Saitoh ◽  
Takufumi Yanagisawa ◽  
Satoru Oshino ◽  
Masayuki Hirata ◽  
Tetsu Goto ◽  
...  

2000 ◽  
Vol 93 (5) ◽  
pp. 873-875 ◽  
Author(s):  
Angelo Franzini ◽  
Paolo Ferroli ◽  
Domenico Servello ◽  
Giovanni Broggi

✓ The authors describe a case of complete recovery from the so-called “thalamic hand” syndrome following chronic motor cortex stimulation in a 64-year-old man suffering from poststroke thalamic central pain. As of the 2-year follow-up examination, the patient's dystonia and pain are still controlled by electrical stimulation.It is speculated that a common mechanism in which the thalamocortical circuit loops are rendered out of balance may sustain hand dystonia and central pain in this case of thalamic syndrome. To the authors' knowledge this is the first reported case of its kind.


2014 ◽  
Vol 29 (2) ◽  
pp. 272-274 ◽  
Author(s):  
Erlick A.C. Pereira ◽  
Tom Moore ◽  
Liz Moir ◽  
Tipu Z. Aziz

Neurosurgery ◽  
2005 ◽  
Vol 57 (2) ◽  
pp. 413-413
Author(s):  
Yves Lazorthes ◽  
Jean-Christophe Sol ◽  
Pascal Cintas ◽  
Jean-Albert Lotterie ◽  
Jean-Claude Verdie ◽  
...  

PAIN RESEARCH ◽  
2006 ◽  
Vol 21 (3) ◽  
pp. 111-115
Author(s):  
Haruhiko Kishima ◽  
Youichi Saitoh ◽  
Amami Kato ◽  
Azuma Hirayama ◽  
Satoru Oshino ◽  
...  

1975 ◽  
Vol 42 (3) ◽  
pp. 301-307 ◽  
Author(s):  
Karl D. Nielson ◽  
John E. Adams ◽  
Yoshio Hosobuchi

✓ Good to excellent relief of phantom pain is reported in 5 of 6 patients by the use of dorsal column stimulation. Follow-up periods are 7 to 25 months. One failure occurred despite excellent pain relief; this patient could not tolerate application of the DCS apparatus to his chest wall. The authors review the physiology involved and some less successful series reported by others.


The Lancet ◽  
1999 ◽  
Vol 353 (9148) ◽  
pp. 212 ◽  
Author(s):  
Youichi Saitoh ◽  
Masahiko Shibata ◽  
Yasuhiro Sanada ◽  
Takashi Mashimo

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document