Motor cortex stimulation for deafferentation pain

2001 ◽  
Vol 11 (3) ◽  
pp. 1-5 ◽  
Author(s):  
Youichi Saitoh ◽  
Shun-ichiro Hirano ◽  
Amami Kato ◽  
Haruhiko Kishima ◽  
Masayuki Hirata ◽  
...  

Object The authors tested a modified motor cortex stimulation (MCS) protocol for the treatment of deafferentation pain in 15 patients: eight patients with poststroke pain, four with brachial plexus injury, two with phantom limb pain, and one with spinal cord injury. Methods Preoperative pharmacological tests were performed with phentolamine, lidocaine, ketamine, thiopental, morphine, and a placebo. In 12 patients we placed a 20– or 40–grid electrode in the subdural space to determine the best stimulation point for pain relief over a few weeks and therefore the optimum position for a permanent internal device. In four patients, the MCS devices were implanted in the interhemispheric fissure to reduce lower-extremity pain. In one patient, the MCS device was placed within the central sulcus, and a 20-grid electrode was placed on the brain surface. In two patients with pain extending from the upper extremity to the hyperbody, dual-electrode devices were implanted to drive two electrodes. In 10 of the 15 patients MCS-induced pain reduction was achieved (four with excellent, two with good, and four with fair alleviation of pain). The result of pharmacological testing indicated that patients with ketamine sensitivity seem to be good candidates for MCS. Conclusions Test stimulation with a subdural multigrid electrode was helpful in locating the best stimulation point for pain relief.

2000 ◽  
Vol 92 (1) ◽  
pp. 150-155 ◽  
Author(s):  
Youichi Saitoh ◽  
Masahiko Shibata ◽  
Shun-ichiro Hirano ◽  
Masayuki Hirata ◽  
Takashi Mashimo ◽  
...  

✓ The authors tested a modified motor cortex stimulation protocol for treatment of central and peripheral types of deafferentation pain. Four patients with thalamic pain and four with peripheral deafferentation pain were studied. Preoperative pharmacological tests of pain relief were performed using phentolamine, lidocaine, ketamine, thiopental, and placebo. In five patients we placed a 20- or 40-electrode grid in the subdural space to determine the best stimulation point for pain relief for a few weeks before definitive placement of a four-electrode array. In three patients, the four-electrode array was implanted in the interhemispheric fissure as a one-stage procedure to treat lower-extremity pain. In two patients with pain extending from the extremity to the trunk or hip, dual devices were implanted to drive two electrodes.Six of eight patients experienced pain reduction (two each with excellent, good, and fair relief) from motor cortex stimulation. No correlation was apparent between pharmacological test results and the effectiveness of motor cortex stimulation. Patients with peripheral deafferentation pain, including two with phantom-limb pain and two with brachial plexus injury, attained pain relief from motor cortex stimulation, with excellent results in two cases. Testing performed with a subdural multiple-electrode grid was helpful in locating the best stimulation point for pain relief. Motor cortex stimulation may be effective for treating peripheral as well as central deafferentation pain.


2001 ◽  
Vol 77 (1-4) ◽  
pp. 172-176 ◽  
Author(s):  
J.Ch. Sol ◽  
J. Casaux ◽  
F.E. Roux ◽  
J.A. Lotterie ◽  
P. Bousquet ◽  
...  

2007 ◽  
Vol 58 ◽  
pp. S29
Author(s):  
Youichi Saitoh ◽  
Takufumi Yanagisawa ◽  
Satoru Oshino ◽  
Masayuki Hirata ◽  
Tetsu Goto ◽  
...  

2014 ◽  
Vol 29 (2) ◽  
pp. 272-274 ◽  
Author(s):  
Erlick A.C. Pereira ◽  
Tom Moore ◽  
Liz Moir ◽  
Tipu Z. Aziz

Neurosurgery ◽  
2005 ◽  
Vol 57 (2) ◽  
pp. 413-413
Author(s):  
Yves Lazorthes ◽  
Jean-Christophe Sol ◽  
Pascal Cintas ◽  
Jean-Albert Lotterie ◽  
Jean-Claude Verdie ◽  
...  

PAIN RESEARCH ◽  
2006 ◽  
Vol 21 (3) ◽  
pp. 111-115
Author(s):  
Haruhiko Kishima ◽  
Youichi Saitoh ◽  
Amami Kato ◽  
Azuma Hirayama ◽  
Satoru Oshino ◽  
...  

The Lancet ◽  
1999 ◽  
Vol 353 (9148) ◽  
pp. 212 ◽  
Author(s):  
Youichi Saitoh ◽  
Masahiko Shibata ◽  
Yasuhiro Sanada ◽  
Takashi Mashimo

2001 ◽  
Vol 77 (1-4) ◽  
pp. 159-162 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yoichi Katayama ◽  
Takamitsu Yamamoto ◽  
Kazutaka Kobayashi ◽  
Masahiko Kasai ◽  
Hideki Oshima ◽  
...  

Neurosurgery ◽  
2001 ◽  
Vol 48 (3) ◽  
pp. 681-688 ◽  
Author(s):  
Franck-Emmanuel Roux ◽  
Danielle Ibarrola ◽  
Yves Lazorthes ◽  
Isabelle Berry

Abstract OBJECTIVE AND IMPORTANCE Chronic motor cortex stimulation has provided satisfactory control of pain in patients with central or neuropathic trigeminal pain. We used this technique in a patient who experienced phantom limb pain. Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) was used to guide electrode placement and to assist in understanding the control mechanisms involved in phantom limb pain. CLINICAL PRESENTATION A 45-year-old man whose right arm had been amputated 2 years previously experienced phantom limb pain and phantom limb phenomena, described as the apparent possibility of moving the amputated hand voluntarily. He was treated with chronic motor cortex stimulation. INTERVENTION Data from fMRI were used pre- and postoperatively to detect shoulder and stump cortical activated areas and the “virtual” amputated hand cortical area. These sites of preoperative fMRI activation were integrated in an infrared-based frameless stereotactic device for surgical planning. Phantom limb virtual finger movement caused contralateral primary motor cortex activation. Satisfactory pain control was obtained; a 70% reduction in the phantom limb pain was achieved on a visual analog scale. Postoperatively and under chronic stimulation, inhibiting effects on the primary sensorimotor cortex as well as on the contralateral primary motor and sensitive cortices were detected by fMRI studies. CONCLUSION Chronic motor cortex stimulation can be used to relieve phantom limb pain and phantom limb phenomena. Integrated by an infrared-based frameless stereotactic device, fMRI data are useful in assisting the neurosurgeon in electrode placement for this indication. Pain control mechanisms and cortical reorganization phenomena can be studied by the use of fMRI.


2014 ◽  
Vol 17;1 (1;17) ◽  
pp. E99-E105
Author(s):  
Wen-Dong Xu

Background: Deafferentation pain secondary to brachial plexus avulsion, spinal cord injury, and other peripheral nerve injuries is often refractory to conventional treatments. Stimulation of the primary motor cortex (M1) has been proven to be an effective treatment for intractable deafferentation pain. The mechanisms underlying the attenuation of deafferentation pain by motor cortex stimulation remain hypothetical. Objectives: The purpose of this case report is to: (1) summarize a case in which a patient suffering chronic intractable deafferentation pain for 25 years underwent rTMS treatment over M1, (2) describe the evidence from PET imaging, and (3) reveal a possible relief mechanism with cortical plasticity. Study design: Case report. Setting: University hospital. Results: This patient had successful pain control with no transient or lasting side effects. The pain relief remained stable for at least one week. At the end of the 20-day procedure, pain relief was obtained according to the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) (-34.6%) and the McGill Pain Questionnaire (MPQ) (-31.6%). In the PET/CT scans, the glucose metabolism was significantly reduced contralaterally to the pain side in the anterior cingulate cortex (ACC), insula, and caudate nucleus. There was no statistically significant difference in any other cortical area. Limitations: Single case of a patient with long-term intractable deafferentation pain having a PET study. Conclusion: This study implies that a single session of 20 Hz rTMS over the motor cortex could reduce the pain level in patients suffering from long-term, intractable deafferentation pain. The stimulation of the M1 induces deactivation in the ACC, insula, and caudate nucleus. The changes in these pain-related regions may mirror an adaptive mechanism to pain relief after rTMS treatment. Key words: Neuropathic pain management, deafferentation pain, transcranial magnetic stimulation, motor cortex stimulation, cortical plasticity, positron emission tomography


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document