scholarly journals Outcome of CABG with or without Coronary Endarterectomy in Bangladesh: A Retrospective Cohort Study

2018 ◽  
Vol 32 (2) ◽  
pp. 77-84
Author(s):  
Redoy Ranjan ◽  
Dipannita Adhikary ◽  
Heemel Saha ◽  
Sabita Mandal ◽  
Sanjoy Kumar Saha ◽  
...  

Objective: In this review, we assess the outcome of surgical revascularization technique, coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) with or without coronary endarterectomy (CE) for patients with diffuse coronary artery disease in a single surgeon’s practice.Methods: We retrospectively reviewed 2189 patients who experienced OPCABG with or without CE between January 2009 and December 2016. The following variables were compared in this study- Intubation time, ICU stay, Postoperative MI, Arrhythmia, renal impairment, stroke and ICU mortality.Results: Of 2189 patients, 1000 patients required coronary endarterectomy in addition to OPCABG. Initially, there was a higher mortality rate and incidence of postoperative blood transfusion in the group of patients who had CE in addition to CABG, with no significant difference in other outcomes. But postoperative use of Heparin, Warfarin and Double antiplatelet agent was associated with decreased mortality significantly in our study. In comparison to other group, the patients in the combined CE with CABG group had a higher incidence of male sex, past MI, and poor left ventricular function. However,emergency CABG, renal impairment, poor left ventricular function, and also peripheral vascular disease were associated with higher mortality in both group of the patients; CE was not a predictor of postoperative mortality.Conclusions: Total surgical revascularization is attainable and accomplishes, when Coronary endarterectomy is performed in addition to Off-pump coronary artery bypass graft in patients when there is no other choice for satisfactory revascularization.Bangladesh Heart Journal 2017; 32(2) : 77-84

2020 ◽  
Vol 23 (1) ◽  
pp. E093-E097 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alaa Omar ◽  
Mahmoud Eldegwy ◽  
Mohamed Allam ◽  
Amr Rouchdy ◽  
Soliman Abdel Hei Soliman ◽  
...  

Objectives: The aim of this study was to compare the use of levosimendan versus intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP) in patients with poor left ventricular function undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) with ejection fraction less than 35%. Methods: Between February 2016 and March 2019, a prospective randomized study was performed on a group of 279 consecutive patients with left ventricular ejection fraction < 35%, who underwent elective CABG without concomitant procedures. These patients were divided into 2 groups, according to the treatment they received – either levosimendan (Group A) or intra-aortic balloon counterpulsation (Group B). Results: There was no statistically significant difference between the 2 groups, regarding mortality and morbidity. In the IABP group, the mean arterial blood pressure (2 hours post cardiopulmonary bypass) significantly was higher, and the heart rate in postoperative Day 1 significantly was lower. The levosimendan group had a significantly lower ICU stay than the IABP group. Conclusion: We found that starting levosimendan infusion after induction of anesthesia is an acceptable option in comparison to IABP. The use of levosimendan in high-risk cardiac patients is comparable to IABP in improving hemodynamics during and after conventional on-pump CABG and results in a shorter ICU stay.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document