scholarly journals Hierarchical Bayesian Small Area Estimation Using Weakly Informative Priors in Ecologically Homogeneous Areas of the Interior Western Forests

2021 ◽  
Vol 4 ◽  
Author(s):  
Grayson W. White ◽  
Kelly S. McConville ◽  
Gretchen G. Moisen ◽  
Tracey S. Frescino

The U.S. Forest Inventory and Analysis Program (FIA) collects inventory data on and computes estimates for many forest attributes to monitor the status and trends of the nation's forests. Increasingly, FIA needs to produce estimates in small geographic and temporal regions. In this application, we implement area level hierarchical Bayesian (HB) small area estimators of several forest attributes for ecosubsections in the Interior West of the US. We use a remotely-sensed auxiliary variable, percent tree canopy cover, to predict response variables derived from ground-collected data such as basal area, biomass, tree count, and volume. We implement four area level HB estimators that borrow strength across ecological provinces and sections and consider prior information on the between-area variation of the response variables. We compare the performance of these HB estimators to the area level empirical best linear unbiased prediction (EBLUP) estimator and to the industry-standard post-stratified (PS) direct estimator. Results suggest that when borrowing strength to areas which are believed to be homogeneous (such as the ecosection level) and a weakly informative prior distribution is placed on the between-area variation parameter, we can reduce variance substantially compared the analogous EBLUP estimator and the PS estimator. Explorations of bias introduced with the HB estimators through comparison with the PS estimator indicates little to no addition of bias. These results illustrate the applicability and benefit of performing small area estimation of forest attributes in a HB framework, as they allow for more precise inference at the ecosubsection level.

2016 ◽  
Vol 44 (4) ◽  
pp. 416-430 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniel Hernandez-Stumpfhauser ◽  
F. Jay Breidt ◽  
Jean D. Opsomer

2019 ◽  
Vol 8 (2) ◽  
pp. 76
Author(s):  
Jusri Repi Basri Yuliani ◽  
Maiyastri Maiyastri ◽  
Rita Diana

Penelitian ini mengkaji tentang pendekatan Hierarchical Bayesian (HB) Loglogistik yang diaplikasikan pada Small Area Estimation (SAE) dengan tujuan mengestimasi tingkat kemiskinan di Kabupaten Padang Pariaman. Metode pendugaan area kecil yang digunakan pada penelitian ini adalah model level area dasar (basic area level model ) dengan bantuan variabel penyerta yang tersedia pada level kecamatan. Variabel penyerta yang digunakan pada penelitian ini yaitu rasio SLTA/Sederajat (X1), persentase keluarga pertanian (X2), rasio industri mikro kecil (X3), persentase buruh tani dalam setiap anggota keluarga (X4), kepadatan penduduk (X5), dan persentase penduduk pelanggan listrik PLN (X6). Bentuk integrasi yang kompleks dari sebaran peluang bersyarat pada model diselesaikan menggunakan Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) dengan menerapkan algortima Gibbs Sampling dan bantuan software WinBugs 1.4.3. Hasil estimasi menggunkan model HB yang diperoleh dibandingkan dengan hasil estimasi pendugaan langsung dengan memperhatikan nilai standard error sebagai tolok ukurnya. Hasil pendugaan tingkat kemiskinan untuk level kecamatan di Kabupaten Padang Pariaman dengan model HB menunjukkan nilai standard error yang kecil.Kata Kunci: Tingkat kemiskinan, Small Area Estimation, Hierarchical Bayesian


2021 ◽  
Vol 16 (4) ◽  
pp. 241-250
Author(s):  
Ferra Yanuar ◽  
Atika Defita Sari ◽  
Dodi Devianto ◽  
Aidinil Zetra

Data on the number of health insurance participants at the subdistrict level is crucial since it is strongly correlated with the availability of health service centers in the areas. This study’s primary purpose is to predict the proportion of health and social security participants of a state-owned company named Badan Penyelenggara Jaminan Sosial Kesehatan (BPJS) in eleven subdistricts in Padang, Indonesia. The direct, ordinary least square, and hierarchical Bayesian for small area estimation (HB-SAE) methods were employed in obtaining the best estimator for the BPJS participants in these small areas. This study found that the HB-SAE method resulted in better estimation than two other methods since it has the smallest standard deviation value. The auxiliary variable age (percentage of individuals more than 50 years old) and the percentage of health complaints have a significant effect on the proportion of the number of BPJS participants based on the HB-SAE method.


2018 ◽  
Vol 204 ◽  
pp. 287-295 ◽  
Author(s):  
Neil R. Ver Planck ◽  
Andrew O. Finley ◽  
John A. Kershaw ◽  
Aaron R. Weiskittel ◽  
Megan C. Kress

2011 ◽  
Vol 41 (6) ◽  
pp. 1189-1201 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael E. Goerndt ◽  
Vicente J. Monleon ◽  
Hailemariam Temesgen

One of the challenges often faced in forestry is the estimation of forest attributes for smaller areas of interest within a larger population. Small-area estimation (SAE) is a set of techniques well suited to estimation of forest attributes for small areas in which the existing sample size is small and auxiliary information is available. Selected SAE methods were compared for estimating a variety of forest attributes for small areas using ground data and light detection and ranging (LiDAR) derived auxiliary information. The small areas of interest consisted of delineated stands within a larger forested population. Four different estimation methods were compared for predicting forest density (number of trees/ha), quadratic mean diameter (cm), basal area (m2/ha), top height (m), and cubic stem volume (m3/ha). The precision and bias of the estimation methods (synthetic prediction (SP), multiple linear regression based composite prediction (CP), empirical best linear unbiased prediction (EBLUP) via Fay–Herriot models, and most similar neighbor (MSN) imputation) are documented. For the indirect estimators, MSN was superior to SP in terms of both precision and bias for all attributes. For the composite estimators, EBLUP was generally superior to direct estimation (DE) and CP, with the exception of forest density.


Stat ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 108-116 ◽  
Author(s):  
Aaron T. Porter ◽  
Scott H. Holan ◽  
Christopher K. Wikle

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document