A History of Burn Care

Keyword(s):  
Medicina ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 57 (4) ◽  
pp. 380
Author(s):  
Deepak K. Ozhathil ◽  
Michael W. Tay ◽  
Steven E. Wolf ◽  
Ludwik K. Branski

Thermal injuries have been a phenomenon intertwined with the human condition since the dawn of our species. Autologous skin translocation, also known as skin grafting, has played an important role in burn wound management and has a rich history of its own. In fact, some of the oldest known medical texts describe ancient methods of skin translocation. In this article, we examine how skin grafting has evolved from its origins of necessity in the ancient world to the well-calibrated tool utilized in modern medicine. The popularity of skin grafting has ebbed and flowed multiple times throughout history, often suppressed for cultural, religious, pseudo-scientific, or anecdotal reasons. It was not until the 1800s, that skin grafting was widely accepted as a safe and effective treatment for wound management, and shortly thereafter for burn injuries. In the nineteenth and twentieth centuries skin grafting advanced considerably, accelerated by exponential medical progress and the occurrence of man-made disasters and global warfare. The introduction of surgical instruments specifically designed for skin grafting gave surgeons more control over the depth and consistency of harvested tissues, vastly improving outcomes. The invention of powered surgical instruments, such as the electric dermatome, reduced technical barriers for many surgeons, allowing the practice of skin grafting to be extended ubiquitously from a small group of technically gifted reconstructive surgeons to nearly all interested sub-specialists. The subsequent development of biologic and synthetic skin substitutes have been spurred onward by the clinical challenges unique to burn care: recurrent graft failure, microbial wound colonization, and limited donor site availability. These improvements have laid the framework for more advanced forms of tissue engineering including micrografts, cultured skin grafts, aerosolized skin cell application, and stem-cell impregnated dermal matrices. In this article, we will explore the convoluted journey that modern skin grafting has taken and potential future directions the procedure may yet go.


Burns ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 41 (4) ◽  
pp. 680-688 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joseph Hardwicke ◽  
Angus Kohlhardt ◽  
Naiem Moiemen

2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S274-S274
Author(s):  
Victor C Joe

Abstract Introduction Genealogies, or family trees, provide graphic representations of family history, tracing lines of decent among its members. Professional sports, most notably the National Football League (NFL), have borrowed this concept in delineating “coaching trees”. Connections among coaches can be described by the head coach-assistant coach relationships and utilized to demonstrate philosophical influences among coaches. This project was an attempt to explore the application of this concept to the profession of burn surgery and see if it could provide insight into the relationships (i.e., mentorship) that have influenced generations of burn surgeons over the past fifty years. Methods The first step in the process was to examine data sources. This consisted of gleaning information from the American Burn Association (ABA) archives (1976–1996) housed at the National Library of Medicine, the digital archives of the ABA, relevant review of the peer-reviewed literature, the public domain (world wide web), and documentation from various burn programs. The next step was to consider varying methodological approaches to the construction of the tree. Results While coaching relationships in the NFL represent a complex adaptive network, the relationships in an burn surgical coaching tree represent an even more complex network and the analogies between the two systems break down. As an exploratory project, the decision was made to construct several different trees with relative simple relational lines, concentrating central nodes on various past association presidents, prominent burn directors, and robust burn fellowship programs. This was done to illustrate proof-of-concept and inform future iterations of the project. Conclusions Creating burn surgery coaching trees can be done demonstrating relatively simple relational lines and provide basic illustrations of the influences of leadership among generations and institutions. More advanced mathematical and social science methodologies can be applied to explore these relationships in greater depth and elucidate a more thorough understanding of successful relationships, mentorship, and leadership dynamics in this complex adaptive network. Applicability of Research to Practice The description of coaching trees provides important insights into the history of burn surgery and the process can be replicated for other professions represented on the burn care team. It validates the importance of maintaining robust archives for our posterity. The information thus organized may inform the approach of the organization and/or inclined individual leaders on how mentorship occurs within our profession.


Author(s):  
Celine Yeung ◽  
Alex Kiss ◽  
Sarah Rehou ◽  
Shahriar Shahrokhi

Abstract Patients with burn injuries require large doses of opioids and gabapentinoids to achieve pain control and are often discharged from hospital with similar amounts. This study aimed to identify patient risk factors that increase analgesic requirements among patients with burn injuries and to determine the relationship between opioid and gabapentinoid use. Patient charts from July 1, 2015 to 2018 were reviewed retrospectively to determine analgesic requirements 24 hours before discharge. Linear mixed regression models were performed to determine patient risk factors (age, gender, history of substance misuse, TBSA of burn, length of stay in hospital, history of psychiatric illness, or surgical treatment) that may increase analgesic requirements. This study found that patients with a history of substance misuse (P = .01) or who were managed surgically (P = .01) required higher doses of opioids at discharge. Similarly, patients who had undergone surgical debridement required more gabapentinoids (P < .001). For every percent increase in TBSA, patients also required 14 mg more gabapentinoids (P = .01). In contrast, older patients (P = .006) and those with a longer hospital stay (P = .009) required fewer amounts of gabapentinoids before discharge. By characterizing factors that increase analgesic requirements at discharge, burn care providers may have a stronger understanding of which patients are at greater risk of developing chronic opioid or gabapentinoid misuse. The quantity and duration of analgesics prescribed at discharge may then be tailored according to these patient specific risk factors.


2019 ◽  
pp. 3-16
Author(s):  
Leopoldo C. Cancio ◽  
Steven E. Wolf
Keyword(s):  

Burns ◽  
1986 ◽  
Vol 12 (7) ◽  
pp. 508-517 ◽  
Author(s):  
Melba D. Pinnegar ◽  
Fred C. Pinnegar
Keyword(s):  

2021 ◽  
Vol 42 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S47-S47
Author(s):  
Celine Yeung ◽  
Alex Kiss ◽  
Sarah Rehou ◽  
Shahriar Shahrohki

Abstract Introduction Large quantities of analgesics are prescribed to control pain among patients with burn injuries and may lead to chronic use and dependency. This study aimed to determine whether patients are overprescribed analgesics at discharge and to identify factors that influence prescribing patterns. Methods A retrospective review of patient charts (n = 199) between July 1, 2015 - 2018 were reviewed from a registry at a single burn center. Opioid, neuropathic pain agent (NPAs), acetaminophen, and ibuprofen quantities given before and at discharge were compared. Linear mixed regression models were used to identify factors that increased the amount of analgesics prescribed among burn care providers. Results On average, patients were prescribed significantly more analgesics at discharge compared to what was consumed pre-discharge (p < 0.0001). Specifically, on average, providers did not overprescribe the daily dose of analgesics, but overprescribed the duration of pain medications required. For every increase in percent TBSA, 14 MEQ more opioids, 203 mg more NPAs, 843 mg more acetaminophen, and 126 mg more ibuprofen were prescribed (p < 0.05). Surgery was a predictor for higher opioid and NPA prescriptions (p = 0.03), while length of stay was associated with fewer NPAs prescribed (p = 0.04). Fewer ibuprofen were given to patients with a history of substance misuse (p = 0.01). Conclusions The quantity of analgesics prescribed at discharge varied widely and often prescribed for long durations of time. Standardized prescribing guidelines should be developed to optimize how analgesics are prescribed at discharge.


Medicina ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 57 (6) ◽  
pp. 541
Author(s):  
Lars-Peter Kamolz ◽  
Bernd Hartmann
Keyword(s):  

Burn injuries are still one of the most common and devastating injuries in humans and the treatment of major burns remains a major challenge for physicians worldwide [...]


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document