Faculty Opinions recommendation of Plastid division is mediated by combinatorial assembly of plastid division proteins.

Author(s):  
Katherine Osteryoung
2005 ◽  
Vol 43 (6) ◽  
pp. 811-823 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jodi Maple ◽  
Cassie Aldridge ◽  
Simon Geir Møller

2015 ◽  
Vol 4 (9) ◽  
pp. 987-1000 ◽  
Author(s):  
Brady F. Cress ◽  
Ö. Duhan Toparlak ◽  
Sanjay Guleria ◽  
Matthew Lebovich ◽  
Jessica T. Stieglitz ◽  
...  

AoB Plants ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 2010 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kevin Andrew Pyke
Keyword(s):  

FEBS Letters ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 581 (11) ◽  
pp. 2162-2167 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jodi Maple ◽  
Simon Geir Møller
Keyword(s):  

2022 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alexander Istvan MacLeod ◽  
Parth K Raval ◽  
Simon Stockhorst ◽  
Michael Knopp ◽  
Eftychios Frangedakis ◽  
...  

The first plastid evolved from an endosymbiotic cyanobacterium in the common ancestor of the Archaeplastida. The transformative steps from cyanobacterium to organelle included the transfer of control over developmental processes; a necessity for the host to orchestrate, for example, the fission of the organelle. The plastids of almost all embryophytes divide independent from nuclear division, leading to cells housing multiple plastids. Hornworts, however, are monoplastidic (or near-monoplastidic) and their photosynthetic organelles are a curious exception among embryophytes for reasons such as the occasional presence of pyrenoids. Here we screened genomic and transcriptomic data of eleven hornworts for components of plastid developmental pathways. We find intriguing differences among hornworts and specifically highlight that pathway components involved in regulating plastid development and biogenesis were differentially lost in this group of bryophytes. In combination with ancestral state reconstruction, our data suggest that hornworts have reverted back to a monoplastidic phenotype due to the combined loss of two plastid division-associated genes: ARC3 and FtsZ2.


2005 ◽  
Vol 48 (11) ◽  
pp. 3816-3822 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mireille Krier ◽  
João X. de Araújo-Júnior ◽  
Martine Schmitt ◽  
Jérôme Duranton ◽  
Hélène Justiano-Basaran ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 13 (6) ◽  
pp. 864-878 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tianhu Sun ◽  
Hui Yuan ◽  
Cheng Chen ◽  
Deena K. Kadirjan-Kalbach ◽  
Michael Mazourek ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Vol 32 (6) ◽  
pp. 937-939 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kun Yang ◽  
Giovanni Stracquadanio ◽  
Jingchuan Luo ◽  
Jef D. Boeke ◽  
Joel S. Bader

Abstract Summary: Combinatorial assembly of DNA elements is an efficient method for building large-scale synthetic pathways from standardized, reusable components. These methods are particularly useful because they enable assembly of multiple DNA fragments in one reaction, at the cost of requiring that each fragment satisfies design constraints. We developed BioPartsBuilder as a biologist-friendly web tool to design biological parts that are compatible with DNA combinatorial assembly methods, such as Golden Gate and related methods. It retrieves biological sequences, enforces compliance with assembly design standards and provides a fabrication plan for each fragment. Availability and implementation: BioPartsBuilder is accessible at http://public.biopartsbuilder.org and an Amazon Web Services image is available from the AWS Market Place (AMI ID: ami-508acf38). Source code is released under the MIT license, and available for download at https://github.com/baderzone/biopartsbuilder. Contact: [email protected] Supplementary information: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document