Faculty Opinions recommendation of Evidence-based surgery for cesarean delivery: an updated systematic review.

Author(s):  
Bernard Wittels
2013 ◽  
Vol 209 (4) ◽  
pp. 294-306 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joshua D. Dahlke ◽  
Hector Mendez-Figueroa ◽  
Dwight J. Rouse ◽  
Vincenzo Berghella ◽  
Jason K. Baxter ◽  
...  

2006 ◽  
Vol 195 (4) ◽  
pp. 1187-1188
Author(s):  
Samir Hidar ◽  
Olivier Irion ◽  
Hisham Ramadani ◽  
Hédi Khaïri

2005 ◽  
Vol 193 (5) ◽  
pp. 1607-1617 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vincenzo Berghella ◽  
Jason K. Baxter ◽  
Suneet P. Chauhan

2021 ◽  
Vol 6 ◽  
pp. 29-39
Author(s):  
Kovi E. Bessoff ◽  
Jeff Choi ◽  
Christopher J. Wolff ◽  
Aditi Kashikar ◽  
Garrison M. Carlos ◽  
...  

2014 ◽  
Vol 34 (3) ◽  
pp. 136-137
Author(s):  
J.D. Dahlke ◽  
H. Mendez-Figueroa ◽  
D.J. Rouse ◽  
V. Berghella ◽  
J.K. Baxter ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
KOVI E. BESSOFF ◽  
Jeff Choi ◽  
Christopher J. Wolff ◽  
Aditi Kashikar ◽  
Garrison Carlos ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 43 (1) ◽  
pp. 65-77 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carina Van Rooyen ◽  
Ruth Stewart ◽  
Thea De Wet

Big international development donors such as the UK’s Department for International Development and USAID have recently started using systematic review as a methodology to assess the effectiveness of various development interventions to help them decide what is the ‘best’ intervention to spend money on. Such an approach to evidence-based decision-making has long been practiced in the health sector in the US, UK, and elsewhere but it is relatively new in the development field. In this article we use the case of a systematic review of the impact of microfinance on the poor in sub-Saharan African to indicate how systematic review as a methodology can be used to assess the impact of specific development interventions.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document