scholarly journals Role of band ligation for secondary prophylaxis of variceal bleeding

2018 ◽  
Vol 24 (26) ◽  
pp. 2902-2914 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ioanna Aggeletopoulou ◽  
Christos Konstantakis ◽  
Spilios Manolakopoulos ◽  
Christos Triantos
2020 ◽  
Vol 73 (10) ◽  
pp. 2133-2137
Author(s):  
Dariia I. Voroniak ◽  
Oleg S. Godik ◽  
Larysa Ya. Fedoniuk ◽  
Olena М. Shapoval ◽  
Viktoriia V. Piliponova

The aim: To evaluate the efficacy of endoscopic variceal band ligation (EVL) after the first esophageal EVL session in children with PH according to endoscopic data. Materials and methods: EVL was performed to 39 patients with PH for the purpose of variceal bleeding primary and secondary prophylaxis. Results: Esophageal varices grade decrease was observed in 22 (56.41%) children. Cases of early rebleeding (within 14 days after EVL) were not registered. Eradication of varices was successful in 11 (28.2%) of patients. In 1 (2.56%) case the complication (bleeding) occurred while banding procedure. 1 (2.56%) patients had bleeding from gastric varices prior to a control endoscopy. Portal gastropathy grade changes were observed in 17 (43.59%) patients. Conclusions: EVL is a safe and effective method of esophageal varices bleeding prophylaxis. This method allows control the esophageal varices grade at different phases of PH treatment in children. Even one EVL session can decrease the grade of esophageal varices (р<0.001). The EVL effect on the severity of portal gastropathy (p=0.02) and on the red marks presence (p=0.005) was also determined. EVL reduced the risk of variceal rebleeding (р=0.05, RR=0.05 (95%CI 0.01-0.32)).


Medwave ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 17 (Suppl1) ◽  
pp. e6847-e6847 ◽  
Author(s):  
Petre Cotoras ◽  
Jorge Faúndez ◽  
Roberto Candia

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Philip Dunne ◽  
Peter Hayes ◽  
Dhiraj Tripathi ◽  
Joanna Leithead ◽  
Lyn Smith ◽  
...  

2011 ◽  
Vol 139 (5-6) ◽  
pp. 328-332 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sasa Grgov ◽  
Perica Stamenkovic

Introduction. Endoscopic band ligation (EBL) is superior to endoscopic injection sclerotherapy (EIS) of oesophageal varices, however, EBL is associated with a higher rate of variceal recurrences. Objective. To examine whether the reduction of recurrent varices can be achieved by additional sclerotherapy of remnant little varices after ligation. Methods. Forty-eight patients with liver cirrhosis who had previously bled from oesophageal varices were examined. Endoscopic therapy was performed in order to prevent recurrent variceal bleeding. I group: in 23 patients ligation of oesophageal varices with multi band ligation device was applied (EBL group). II group: in 25 patients sclerotherapy using polydocanol or absolute alcohol was applied after reducing the size of varices using ligation (EBL and EIS group). Results. There was no statistically significant difference between the examined groups of patients in relation to the number of sessions for variceal eradication, recurrence of variceal bleeding, deterioration of portal gastropathy and mortality in the observed period from 18.8?18.6 months (EBL group) and 22.2?26.2 months (EBL and EIS group). Variceal recurrence was verified in 21.7% of patients of the EBL group and 16% of the EBL and EIS group, but the difference was not statistically important. Several complications, such as dysphagia and chest pain, were statistically more frequent in the EBL and EIS group of patients. Conclusion. The combined method of ligation and extra sclerosing of remnant small oesophageal varices after ligation does not have advantage in relation to the ligation alone.


1999 ◽  
Vol 17 (3) ◽  
pp. 180-180
Author(s):  
Richard S. Bloomfeld ◽  
Scott R. Brazer

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document