scholarly journals Visual search asymmetry: The influence of stimulus familiarity and low-level features

2001 ◽  
Vol 63 (3) ◽  
pp. 464-475 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jiye Shen ◽  
Eyal M. Reingold
2019 ◽  
Vol 82 (3) ◽  
pp. 938-943 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael J. Morgan ◽  
Joshua A. Solomon

AbstractThe ability to detect sudden changes in the environment is important for survival. However, studies of “change blindness” have shown that image differences are hard to detect when a time delay or a mask is imposed between the different images. However, when sensory adaptation is permitted by accurate fixation, we find that change detection is not only possible but asymmetrical: a single changed target amongst 15 unchanging distractors is much easier to detect than a target defined by its lack of change. Although adaptation may selectively reduce the apparent contrast of unchanged objects, the asymmetry in “change salience” cannot be attributed to any such reduction because genuine reductions in target contrast increase, rather than decrease, target detectability. Analogous results preclude attribution to apparent differences between (a) target onset and distractor onset and (b) their temporal frequencies (both flickered at 7.5 Hz, minimizing afterimages). Our results demonstrate a hitherto underappreciated (or unappreciated) advantage conferred by low-level sensory adaptation: it automatically elevates the salience of previously absent objects.


2003 ◽  
Vol 29 (2) ◽  
pp. 118-129 ◽  
Author(s):  
John M. Pearce ◽  
David N. George

1993 ◽  
Vol 76 (3_suppl) ◽  
pp. 1287-1295 ◽  
Author(s):  
Masaki Tomonaga

Two chimpanzees and two humans were trained on visual search tasks with several sets of geometric forms composed of 1 and 2 elements (graphemes). When the double-grapheme item was the target and single grapheme item was the distractor, both chimpanzees and humans searched the target quickly irrespective of the display size. On the other hand, when the single-grapheme item was the target and double-grapheme item was the distractor, they showed an increase in response times as a function of the display size on some sets of stimuli. These results were considered as evidence for search asymmetry by chimpanzees.


2013 ◽  
Vol 17 (1) ◽  
pp. 67-76 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ryuzaburo Nakata ◽  
Satoshi Eifuku ◽  
Ryoi Tamura

Author(s):  
Jun Saiki ◽  
Takahiko Koike ◽  
Kohske Takahashi ◽  
Tomoko Inoue

1995 ◽  
Vol 102 (2) ◽  
pp. 356-378 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wilson S. Geisler ◽  
Kee-Lee Chou

2002 ◽  
Vol 41 (3) ◽  
pp. 241-252 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peter Gerhardstein ◽  
Kimberly S. Kraebel ◽  
Jennifer Gillis ◽  
Shana Lassiter

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document