scholarly journals Interference effects in short-term memory as a function of input modality and the linguistic relationship between learned lists

1980 ◽  
Vol 15 (1) ◽  
pp. 12-14 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrew L. Weiman ◽  
William Bevan
1976 ◽  
Vol 85 (3) ◽  
pp. 303-308 ◽  
Author(s):  
Edward Bauman ◽  
Eugene Kolisnyk

1972 ◽  
Vol 24 (3) ◽  
pp. 253-261 ◽  
Author(s):  
Edith V. Sullivan ◽  
M. T. Turvey

In three experiments subjects were required to reproduce after varying delays the locus of a tactile stimulation delivered to the upper-side of the arm. During the retention periods subjects either performed a subsidiary, arithmetic task or rested. Recall, as measured by accuracy in reproducing the locus of stimulation, decreased as a function of retention interval, asymptoting after approximately 5 s. Performance was poorer in the subsidiary task condition than in the rest condition; however, the effect of the subsidiary task appeared to be more on subject recall strategies than on rehearsal capacity. No evidence of proactive interference effects was found, and a decay interpretation of forgetting of discrete tactile stimuli in the short-term memory distractor paradigm was favoured.


1975 ◽  
Vol 40 (3) ◽  
pp. 791-794 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lauren Leslie

The short-term memory for serial order of third and fourth grade normal and retarded readers ( Ns = 13) was studied. Six pictures of common objects were spatially presented and subjects were required to reconstruct the sequence. On the first six trials, the same pictures were repeatedly presented in different sequences. On the seventh trial, a new set of stimuli was introduced. Analysis of short-term memory over trials showed that normal and retarded readers were similar on Trial 1 but the performance of retarded readers deteriorated more over trials than the performance of normal readers. Short-term memory of both groups improved on Trial 7. The results indicate a greater susceptibility to interference in the short-term memory of retarded readers.


1973 ◽  
Vol 101 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-9 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lynn Hasher ◽  
Judith Goggin ◽  
Donald A. Riley

1967 ◽  
Vol 19 (2) ◽  
pp. 109-114 ◽  
Author(s):  
Susan A. Margrain

The two experiments reported are concerned with short-term memory for digit lists simultaneously presented both auditorily and visually. Results showed (1) that interpolated written and verbal recall differentially affect retention depending on whether the to-be-recalled list was presented auditorily or visually. (2) That input modality appears to be far more important for recall than was directing subjects' attention to a list during input, when that list might or might not have been subsequently required for recall. The results suggest that short-term storage is modality specific. In this case, Broadbent's P and S mechanisms do not adequately describe what happens during simultaneous visual and auditory presentation. Nor would Sperling's suggestion of a final auditory store appear to be supported.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document