Obtaining Quality Extended Field-of-View Ultrasound Images of Skeletal Muscle to Measure Muscle Fascicle Length

Author(s):  
Amy N. Adkins ◽  
Wendy M. Murray

2010 ◽  
Vol 109 (6) ◽  
pp. 1974-1979 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Noorkoiv ◽  
A. Stavnsbo ◽  
P. Aagaard ◽  
A. J. Blazevich

The present study examined the reliability and validity of in vivo vastus lateralis (VL) fascicle length ( Lf) assessment by extended field-of-view ultrasonography (EFOV US). Intraexperimenter and intersession reliability of EFOV US were tested. Further, Lf measured from EFOV US images were compared to Lf measured from static US images (6-cm FOV) where out-of-field fascicle portions were trigonometrically estimated (linear extrapolation). Finally, spatial accuracy of the EFOV technique was assessed by comparing Lf measured on swine VL by EFOV US to actual measurements from digital photographs. The difference between repeated VL Lf measurements by the same experimenter was 2.1 ± 1.7% with an intraclass correlation (ICC) of 0.99 [95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.95–1.00]. In terms of intersession reliability, no difference ( P = 0.48) was observed between Lf measured on two different occasions, with ICC = 0.95 (CI = 0.80–0.99). The average absolute difference between Lf measured by EFOV US and using linear extrapolation was 12.6 ± 8.1% [ICC = 0.76 (CI = −0.20–0.94)]; EFOV Lf was always longer than extrapolated Lf. The relative error of measurement between Lf measured by EFOV US and by dissective assessment (digital photographs) in isolated swine VL was 0.84% ± 2.6% with an ICC of 0.99 (CI = 0.94–1.00). These results show that EFOV US is a reliable and valid method for the measurement of long muscle fascicle in vivo. Thus EFOV US analysis was proven more accurate for the assessment of skeletal muscle fascicle length than conventional extrapolation methods.





2020 ◽  
Vol 15 (3) ◽  
pp. 430-436 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dustin J. Oranchuk ◽  
André R. Nelson ◽  
Adam G. Storey ◽  
John B. Cronin

Purpose: Regional muscle-architecture measures are reported widely; however, little is known about the variability of these measurements in the rectus femoris, vastus lateralis, and anterior and lateral vastus intermedius. The aim of this study was to quantify this variability. Methods: Regional muscle thickness, pennation angle (PA), and calculated and extended-field-of-view–derived fascicle length (FL) were quantified in 26 participants using ultrasonography across 51 limbs on 3 occasions. To quantify variability, the typical error of measurement (TEM) was multiplied by 2, and thresholds of 0.2–0.6 (small), 0.6–1.2 (moderate), 1.2–2.0 (large), 2.0–4.0 (very large), and >4.0 (extremely large) were applied. In addition, variability was deemed large when the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was <.67 and coefficient of variation (CV) >10%, moderate when ICC > .67 or CV < 10% (but not both), and small when both ICC > .67 and CV < 10%. Results: Muscle thickness of all muscles and regions had low to moderate variability (ICC = .88–.98, CV = 2.4–9.3%, TEM = 0.15–0.47). PA of the proximal and distal vastus lateralis had low variability (ICC = .85–.96, CV = 3.8–8%) and moderate to large TEM (TEM = 0.42–0.83). PA of the rectus femoris was found to have moderate to very large variability (ICC = .38–.74, CV = 11.4–18.5%, TEM = 0.61–1.29) regardless of region. Extended-field-of-view–derived FL (ICC = .57–.94, CV = 4.1–11.5%, TEM = 0.26–0.88) was superior to calculated FL (ICC = .37–.84, CV = 7.4–17.9%, TEM = 0.44–1.33). Conclusions: Variability of muscle thickness was low in all quadriceps muscles and regions. Only rectus femoris PA and FL measurements were highly variable. The extended-field-of-view technique should be used to assess FL where possible. Inferences based on rectus femoris architecture should be interpreted with caution.





10.29007/p1zn ◽  
2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maged Nasan ◽  
Yannick Morvan ◽  
Guillaume Dardenne ◽  
Jean Chaoui ◽  
Eric Stindel

Patient Specific Instruments (PSIs) have been introduced into the surgical workflow as a modern way to assist the surgeon in performing femur and tibia resection in Total Knee Arthroplasty (TKA). These PSIs are based on an accurate reconstruction of the surface of the knee’s bones.In this work, we propose two 3D-3D image-based registration methods to reconstruct an extended field-of-view of the knee joint using only a motorized ultrasound transducer. Those methods are: (1) a dense voxel-based registration method, which needs to preprocess the ultrasound images and form an ultrasound volume. Then, computing the Mutual Information (MI) for each relative displacement to align every pair of volumes, (2) a sparse point-based registration method, which takes into account the point set located on the surface of the bone in ultrasound images. This method detects bony features using ORB detector and matches the corresponding points to find the best transformation using Coherent Point Drift (CPD).The preliminary qualitative results performed in vitro show that from a set of consecutive ultrasound volumes, an extended field-of-view can be reconstructed using only ultrasound images without any external trackers. Results of the voxel-based approach show that MI is more robust against noise comparing to other similarity measures. On the other hand, results of point-based approach show that is much faster in computation with a low false-positive rate compared to other feature-detectors like SIFT and SURF. Furthermore, experiments show that CPD is less affected by noisy data compared to the classical ICP, which is promising to continue evaluating our work in vivo.





2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gabriel Paiva Fonseca ◽  
Matthias Baer‐Beck ◽  
Eric Fournie ◽  
Christian Hofmann ◽  
Ilaria Rinaldi ◽  
...  


2007 ◽  
Author(s):  
Holger Kunze ◽  
Wolfgang Härer ◽  
Karl Stierstorfer


2008 ◽  
Vol 190 (1) ◽  
pp. 27-31 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eoin C. Kavanagh ◽  
George Koulouris ◽  
Laurence Parker ◽  
William B. Morrison ◽  
Diane Bergin ◽  
...  


2016 ◽  
Vol 7 (2) ◽  
pp. 512 ◽  
Author(s):  
F. Momey ◽  
J.-G. Coutard ◽  
T. Bordy ◽  
F. Navarro ◽  
M. Menneteau ◽  
...  


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document