scholarly journals PLASMA BETA DEPENDENCE OF THE ION-SCALE SPECTRAL BREAK OF SOLAR WIND TURBULENCE: HIGH-RESOLUTION 2D HYBRID SIMULATIONS

2016 ◽  
Vol 833 (1) ◽  
pp. 91 ◽  
Author(s):  
Luca Franci ◽  
Simone Landi ◽  
Lorenzo Matteini ◽  
Andrea Verdini ◽  
Petr Hellinger
2015 ◽  
Vol 804 (2) ◽  
pp. L39 ◽  
Author(s):  
Luca Franci ◽  
Andrea Verdini ◽  
Lorenzo Matteini ◽  
Simone Landi ◽  
Petr Hellinger

2022 ◽  
Vol 924 (2) ◽  
pp. 53
Author(s):  
M. Terres ◽  
Gang Li

Abstract At scales much larger than the ion inertial scale and the gyroradius of thermal protons, the magnetohydrodynamic (MHD) theory is well equipped to describe the nature of solar wind turbulence. The turbulent spectrum itself is defined by a power law manifesting the energy cascading process. A break in the turbulence spectrum develops near-ion scales, signaling the onset of energy dissipation. The exact mechanism for the spectral break is still a matter of debate. In this work, we use the 20 Hz Mercury Surface, Space Environment, Geochemistry, and Ranging (MESSENGER) magnetic field data during four planetary flybys at different heliocentric distances to examine the nature of the spectral break in the solar wind. We relate the spectral break frequencies of the solar wind MHD turbulence, found in the range of 0.3–0.7 Hz, with the well-known characteristic spectral bump at frequencies ∼1 Hz upstream of planetary bow shocks. Spectral breaks and spectral bumps during three planetary flybys are identified from the MESSENGER observations, with heliocentric distances in the range of 0.3–0.7 au. The MESSENGER observations are complemented by one Magnetospheric Multiscale observation made at 1 au. We find that the ratio of the spectral bump frequency to the spectral break frequency appears to be r- and B-independent. From this, we postulate that the wavenumber of the spectral break and the frequency of the spectral bump have the same dependence on the magnetic field strength ∣B∣. The implication of our work on the nature of the break scale is discussed.


2008 ◽  
Vol 675 (2) ◽  
pp. 1576-1583 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. A. Markovskii ◽  
Bernard J. Vasquez ◽  
Charles W. Smith

2018 ◽  
Vol 857 (2) ◽  
pp. 136 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xin Wang ◽  
Chuanyi Tu ◽  
Jiansen He ◽  
Linghua Wang

2018 ◽  
Vol 855 (2) ◽  
pp. L27 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniel Vech ◽  
Alfred Mallet ◽  
Kristopher G. Klein ◽  
Justin C. Kasper

2014 ◽  
Vol 41 (22) ◽  
pp. 8081-8088 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. H. K. Chen ◽  
L. Leung ◽  
S. Boldyrev ◽  
B. A. Maruca ◽  
S. D. Bale

2017 ◽  
Vol 844 (1) ◽  
pp. L9 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alexandros Chasapis ◽  
W. H. Matthaeus ◽  
T. N. Parashar ◽  
S. A. Fuselier ◽  
B. A. Maruca ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document