scholarly journals Robust mechanism design and dominant strategy voting rules

2014 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
pp. 339-360 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tilman Börgers ◽  
Doug Smith
2016 ◽  
Vol 54 (2) ◽  
pp. 589-591

Dimitrios Diamantaras of Temple University reviews “An Introduction to the Theory of Mechanism Design,” by Tilman Börgers. The Econlit abstract of this book begins: “Presents explanations of classic results in the theory of mechanism design and examines the frontiers of research in mechanism design in a text written for advanced undergraduate and graduate students of economics who have a good understanding of game theory. Discusses screening; examples of Bayesian mechanism design; examples of dominant strategy mechanisms; incentive compatibility; Bayesian mechanism design; dominant strategy mechanisms; nontransferable utility; informational interdependence; robust mechanism design; and dynamic mechanism design. Börgers is Samuel Zell Professor of the Economics of Risk at the University of Michigan.”


10.1142/8318 ◽  
2011 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dirk Bergemann ◽  
Stephen Morris

2017 ◽  
Vol 149 ◽  
pp. 59-80 ◽  
Author(s):  
Felix Bierbrauer ◽  
Axel Ockenfels ◽  
Andreas Pollak ◽  
Désirée Rückert

2020 ◽  
Vol 15 (2) ◽  
pp. 511-544 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tomoya Kazumura ◽  
Debasis Mishra ◽  
Shigehiro Serizawa

This paper studies a model of mechanism design with transfers where agents' preferences need not be quasilinear. In such a model, (i) we characterize dominant strategy incentive compatible mechanisms using a monotonicity property, (ii) we establish a revenue uniqueness result (for every dominant strategy implementable allocation rule, there is a unique payment rule that can implement it), and (iii) we show that every dominant strategy incentive compatible, individually rational, and revenue‐maximizing mechanism must charge zero payment for the worst alternative (outside option). These results are applicable in a wide variety of problems (single object auction, multiple object auction, public good provision, etc.) under suitable richness of type space. In particular, our results are applicable to two important type spaces: (a) type space containing an arbitrarily small perturbation of quasilinear type space and (b) type space containing all positive income effect preferences.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document