scholarly journals Separable reduction theorems by the method of elementary submodels

2012 ◽  
Vol 219 (3) ◽  
pp. 191-222 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marek Cúth
Keyword(s):  
1998 ◽  
Vol 82 (1-3) ◽  
pp. 239-266 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lúcia R. Junqueira ◽  
Franklin D. Tall
Keyword(s):  

2001 ◽  
Vol 66 (3) ◽  
pp. 1286-1302 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tapani Hyttinen ◽  
Saharon Shelah

AbstractWe prove a main gap theorem for locally saturated submodels of a homogeneous structure. We also study the number of locally saturated models, which are not elementarily embeddable into each other.


2006 ◽  
Vol 144 (1-3) ◽  
pp. 107-116 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lúcia R. Junqueira ◽  
Paul Larson ◽  
Franklin D. Tall

2002 ◽  
Vol 67 (1) ◽  
pp. 61-68
Author(s):  
Bradd Hart ◽  
Ehud Hrushovski ◽  
Michael C. Laskowski

By a classifiable theory we shall mean a theory which is superstable, without the dimensional order property, which has prime models over pairs. In order to define what we mean by unique decomposition, we remind the reader of several definitions and results. We adopt the usual conventions of stability theory and work inside a large saturated model of a fixed classifiable theory T; for instance, if we write M ⊆ N for models of T, M and N we are thinking of these models as elementary submodels of this fixed saturated models; so, in particular, M is an elementary submodel of N. Although the results will not depend on it, we will assume that T is countable to ease notation.We do adopt one piece of notation which is not completely standard: if T is classifiable, M0 ⊆ Mi for i = 1, 2 are models of T and M1 is independent from M2 over M0 then we write M1M2 for the prime model over M1 ∪ M2.


2014 ◽  
Vol 12 (7) ◽  
Author(s):  
Marek Cúth ◽  
Ondřej Kalenda

AbstractWe compare two methods of proving separable reduction theorems in functional analysis — the method of rich families and the method of elementary submodels. We show that any result proved using rich families holds also when formulated with elementary submodels and the converse is true in spaces with fundamental minimal system and in spaces of density ℵ1. We do not know whether the converse is true in general. We apply our results to show that a projectional skeleton may be without loss of generality indexed by ranges of its projections.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document