scholarly journals Petrology and Mineralogy of Lower Cretaceous sedimentary rocks, Dauntless D-35 well, Scotian Shelf

2009 ◽  
Author(s):  
G Pe-Piper ◽  
D J W Piper
2012 ◽  
Vol 49 (12) ◽  
pp. 1558-1566 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peter H. Reynolds ◽  
Georgia Pe-Piper ◽  
David J.W. Piper

Geochronology of detrital muscovite from the Lower Cretaceous of the central Scotian Basin has shown predominant supply of Meguma terrane detritus, including muscovite with Alleghanian (mid-Carboniferous to Permian) ages from the inner Scotian Shelf. In this study, 87 detrital muscovite grains from five wells in the eastern Scotian Basin, representing depositional ages from Tithonian to Early Albian, were dated by single-grain 40Ar/39Ar techniques. Previous work shows that the provenance of this sediment was different from wells in the central Scotian Basin. Compared with the central Scotian Basin, the muscovite age populations from the eastern Scotian Basin have more (20% versus 7%) pre-Devonian ages, derived from inboard terranes of the Appalachians. In both the central and eastern Scotian Basin, most old grains are found in the Tithonian and the Aptian–Albian, with fewer in the Valanginian and almost none in the Kimmeridgian and the Hauterivian–Barremian. These data suggest rapid unroofing of the Meguma terrane in the Kimmeridgian and Hauterivian–Barremian and greater supply of sediment from Newfoundland to the eastern Scotian Basin in the Tithonian and Aptian–Albian. Compared with the central Scotian Basin, which has most ages in the range 340–300 Ma, the muscovite age populations from the eastern Scotian Basin have a higher proportion of 420–340 Ma and in particular 300–260 Ma ages. Such late Alleghanian overprinting of argon ages is very rare on land in Nova Scotia, but in the Maritimes Basin, this was the time of uplift and erosion of strata.


2015 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
pp. 77-100 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wentao Huang ◽  
Douwe J. J. van Hinsbergen ◽  
Mark J. Dekkers ◽  
Eduardo Garzanti ◽  
Guillaume Dupont-Nivet ◽  
...  

1977 ◽  
Vol 14 (10) ◽  
pp. 2274-2283 ◽  
Author(s):  
John A. Wade

Based on the interpretation of reflection seismic profiles, five major reflecting horizons are correlated from the southwestern Scotian Shelf to Georges Bank. The Mesozoic–Cenozoic stratigraphy of Georges Bank Basin is interpreted to be similar to, but thicker than, the LaHave Platform and consists of 200 m of Tertiary and younger strata, 1000 m of Upper Cretaceous, 600 m of Lower Cretaceous, and 6300 m of Jurassic rocks. The post-Lower Cretaceous facies are interpreted to be clastic across the entire area, while the pre-Upper Cretaceous facies are interpreted to be predominantly clastic in the northern half and predominantly carbonates in the southern half of Georges Bank Basin.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document