scholarly journals Retaining Chorda Tympani Nerve Integrity During Cochlear Implant Surgery

2015 ◽  
Vol 128 (15) ◽  
pp. 2115-2118 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lin-E Wang ◽  
Jiao Xia ◽  
Xi-Xi Shen ◽  
Zhen-Xiao Wang ◽  
Wei Wang ◽  
...  
Author(s):  
Saad Jwair ◽  
Job J. M. van Eijden ◽  
Esther E. Blijleven ◽  
Jan Willem Dankbaar ◽  
Hans G. X. M. Thomeer

Abstract Purpose The round window approach has become the most preferred option for cochlear implant (CI) insertion, however, sometimes it may not be possible due to the (in)visibility of the round window membrane (RWM). We addressed the prevalence, consequences and indicators of difficult detection of the RWM in cochlear implant surgery. Methods This study retrospectively analysed the operative reports and preoperative high resolution axial-computed tomography (CT) scans of a consecutive cohort of patients who underwent a CI insertion. The main outcomes were surgical outcomes of the RW approach, and assessment of radiological markers. Results The operative reports showed that RWM insertion was feasible in 151 out of 153 patients. In 18% of the patients the RWM was difficult to visualize. All these patients had at least one intraoperative event. The chorda tympani nerve (CTN) or posterior canal wall was affected in 8% of the 153 patients and the fallopian canal in 6%. These patients had a facial-chorda tympani nerve distance on the CT scan that was considerably smaller than normal patients (1.5 mm vs 2.3 mm). In addition, a prediction line towards the anterolateral side of the RWM was found to be more prevalent in these patients’ CT scans (sensitivity 81%, specificity 63%). Conclusion The RW approach is feasible in almost all patients undergoing CI surgery. Difficult visualisation of the RWM seems to lead to at least one intraoperative event. Radiological measures showed that these patients had a smaller facial recess and a more anteriorly placed facial nerve, which can be used to better plan a safe insertion approach.


Author(s):  
C Thomas ◽  
J Westwood ◽  
G F Butt

Abstract Background YouTube is increasingly used as a source of healthcare information. This study evaluated the quality of videos on YouTube about cochlear implants. Methods YouTube was searched using the phrase ‘cochlear implant’. The first 60 results were screened by two independent reviewers. A modified Discern tool was used to evaluate the quality of each video. Results Forty-seven videos were analysed. The mean overall Discern score was 2.0 out of 5.0. Videos scored higher for describing positive elements such as the benefits of a cochlear implant (mean score of 3.4) and scored lower for negative elements such as the risks of cochlear implant surgery (mean score of 1.3). Conclusion The quality of information regarding cochlear implant surgery on YouTube is highly variable. These results demonstrated a bias towards the positive attributes of cochlear implants, with little mention of the risks or uncertainty involved. Although videos may be useful as supplementary information, critical elements required to make an informed decision are lacking. This is of particular importance when patients are considering surgery.


2020 ◽  
Vol 29 (10) ◽  
pp. 568-571
Author(s):  
Seita Fukushima ◽  
Noritaka Komune ◽  
Kenichi Kamizono ◽  
Nozomu Matsumoto ◽  
Kazutaka Takaiwa ◽  
...  

Although negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) is widely used, its application to the head and neck region remains challenging due to anatomical complexities. This report presents the case of a female patient presenting with mitochondrial encephalomyopathy with lactic acidosis and stroke-like episodes, uncontrolled diabetes and severe bilateral sensorineural hearing loss. The patient had undergone cochlear implant surgery and five months later the wound was infected with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA). NPWT was started shortly after removing the internal receiver and was stopped 11 days later. NPWT helped in controlling infection and led to a successful wound closure. In this case, NPWT was effective in treating infectious wounds around the auricle after cochlear implant surgery. Declaration of interest: The authors have no financial support for this article and no conflict of interest directly relevant to the content of this article.


2003 ◽  
Vol 24 (3) ◽  
pp. 404-408 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hussam K. El-Kashlan ◽  
H. Alexander Arts ◽  
Steven A. Telian

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document