scholarly journals Bilateral transversus abdominis plane block as a sole anesthetic technique in emergency surgery for perforative peritonitis in a high risk patient

2013 ◽  
Vol 29 (4) ◽  
pp. 540 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lipi Mishra ◽  
Nibedita Pani ◽  
Debasis Mishra ◽  
Nupur Patel
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Haytham El Sayed ◽  
A Shaheed Fadhul ◽  
Mohamed Al Falalki ◽  
M Nasr Awad

Abstract Background: Abdominoplasty is a common aesthetic surgery. Adequate pain management during the postoperative period is of great importance. This research aims to investigate the outcome of the abdominoplasty operation for the patients who have received transversus abdominis plan block in comparison with the non-blocked patients.Methods: 58 patients, undergoing elective abdominoplasty, patients were randomly assigned to two equal groups of 29 patients each. Combined subcostal and posterior transversus abdominis plane block group and non-blocked group. For both groups, the standard postoperative analgesic regimen consisted of IV Paracetamol 1 g every 6 hours. Values of visual analog scale (VAS) were recorded postoperatively, once the patient had a VAS ≥ 4, IV opioids administered. The primary outcome was opioids consumption in the first 72 hours postoperatively, the secondary outcome was the value of VAS at rest and movement (or with knee flexion) in the first 72 hours postoperatively, time to first ambulation and time to first incentive spirometer 900 ml/min were recorded.Results: Pethidine consumption in the first 72 hours was 208.62±85.64 in the non-blocked group and 20.69±25.06 in the blocked group (p < 0.05). VAS was lower in the blocked group during the first 72 hours either during rest or movement where (p < 0.05). Time to first ambulation was 12.41±5.04 hours in the non-blocked group and 4.62±1.08 hours in the blocked group (p < 0.05), time to first incentive spirometer 900 ml/min was 11.45±5.05 hours in the non-blocked group and 4.27±1.09 hours in the blocked group (p < 0.05).Conclusion: Combined subcostal and posterior transversus abdominis plane block is a promising regional anesthetic technique for postoperative pain relief in abdominoplasty surgery, it offers a longer postoperative analgesic effect duration and fewer analgesic requirements with less postoperative complications.Trial Registration Clinical Trial: TCTR20200602001 “Retrospectively registered” Date of registration on May 30, 2020


2021 ◽  
Vol 108 (Supplement_8) ◽  
Author(s):  
Camillo Leonardo Bertoglio ◽  
Bruno Alampi ◽  
Lorenzo Morini ◽  
Marianna Maspero ◽  
Simona Grimaldi ◽  
...  

Abstract Aim to point out the critical issues of the management of a challenging case of complex ventral hernia (CVH) in high risk patient Material and methods A 58-year-old female was referred to our Institution with a history of alcohol and smoking abuse, COPD and class I obesity. Four years before she underwent liver transplantation. In the next two years she had 2 VH repairs with polypropilene (PP) meshes. The postoperative course was complicated by a deep surgical site infection (SSI) and dehiscence. The wound resulted in a large R2 M3-L2 CWH with distorted anatomy. The patient experienced VH incarcerations and bowel obstructions. Clinical examination revealed no signs of infection and the CT scan showed partial loss of substance of the abdominal wall. Results The patient underwent posterior component separation with transversus abdominis release (PCS-TAR) and large PVDF mesh on top of a biosynthetic mesh implantation. The postoperative course was complicated after 14 days by a SSI causing a large wound dehiscence with underlying mesh exposure. The patient was readmitted and negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) with topical wound solution instillation was initiated. After 1 month was followed up as an out-patient to continue traditional NPWT and removal of former PP remnants. NPWT was interrupted after 6 months and no signs of infection nor VH recurrence were recorded at 1 year. Conclusions the indication to PCS-TAR for such comorbid patient should be carefully evaluated. The use of a biosyntetic mesh could be debatable. The conservative management of a chronic infection could be the first-line option in case of macroporous mesh implantations.


1999 ◽  
Vol 6 (4) ◽  
pp. 379-384 ◽  
Author(s):  
Arvind Deshpande ◽  
Mark Lovelock ◽  
Peter Mossop ◽  
Michael Denton ◽  
John Vidovich ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document