Conceptualizations and Research of African American Family Life in the United States: Some Thoughts

2012 ◽  
pp. 51-68 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jualynne Elizabeth Dodson
Hurtin' Words ◽  
2018 ◽  
pp. 132-160
Author(s):  
Ted Ownby

This chapter describes activists who rejected the idea of a crisis in African American family life. In response to the Moynihan Report of 1965, many African Americans rejected claims about the weakness of family life, offering the strength and creativity embodied in adaptable family definitions. At the same time, many African Americans began using the terms “brother” and “sister” not as arguments about racial integration but to refer to the shared experiences of African American men and women.


Author(s):  
Jessie B. Ramey

This chapter begins with the James Caldwell story, which brings the experience of fathers into sharp relief—a significant, and all but forgotten, aspect of orphanage history—as well as the broader history of child care, in the United States. While many orphanage children had living fathers, the institutional managers constructed “orphans” as fatherless, perpetuating a gendered and racialized logic of dependency. Yet for those men using the orphanages as a form of child care, their experiences as widowers differed from those of solo women with children. Furthermore, the experiences of African American and white working-class men were also quite different. Ultimately, the orphanages help reveal the extent to which each group of men was involved with the care of their children, as well as the connection between their breadwinning role and family life.


2000 ◽  
Vol 66 (3) ◽  
pp. 665
Author(s):  
Charles S. Aiken ◽  
Stewart E. Tolnay

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document