scholarly journals The Maximal Subword Complexity of Quasiperiodic Infinite Words

2010 ◽  
Vol 31 ◽  
pp. 169-176 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ronny Polley ◽  
Ludwig Staiger
1989 ◽  
Vol 65 (2) ◽  
pp. 221-242 ◽  
Author(s):  
Filippo Mignosi

2004 ◽  
Vol 15 (01) ◽  
pp. 41-55 ◽  
Author(s):  
LUCIAN ILIE ◽  
SHENG YU ◽  
KAIZHONG ZHANG

With ideas from data compression and combinatorics on words, we introduce a complexity measure for words, called repetition complexity, which quantifies the amount of repetition in a word. The repetition complexity of w, R (w), is defined as the smallest amount of space needed to store w when reduced by repeatedly applying the following procedure: n consecutive occurrences uu…u of the same subword u of w are stored as (u,n). The repetition complexity has interesting relations with well-known complexity measures, such as subword complexity, SUB , and Lempel-Ziv complexity, LZ . We have always R (w)≥ LZ (w) and could even be that the former is linear while the latter is only logarithmic; e.g., this happens for prefixes of certain infinite words obtained by iterated morphisms. An infinite word α being ultimately periodic is equivalent to: (i) [Formula: see text], (ii) [Formula: see text], and (iii) [Formula: see text]. De Bruijn words, well known for their high subword complexity, are shown to have almost highest repetition complexity; the precise complexity remains open. R (w) can be computed in time [Formula: see text] and it is open, and probably very difficult, to find fast algorithms.


2006 ◽  
Vol 157 (11) ◽  
pp. 1532-1549 ◽  
Author(s):  
Werner Kuich ◽  
George Rahonis

1984 ◽  
Vol 8 (2) ◽  
pp. 209-212 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anni Sajo
Keyword(s):  

2004 ◽  
Vol 319 (1-3) ◽  
pp. 127-143 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jean-Charles Delvenne ◽  
Vincent D. Blondel

Sequences ◽  
1990 ◽  
pp. 254-257
Author(s):  
Jacques Justin ◽  
Giuseppe Pirillo

Author(s):  
Daniel Gabric ◽  
Narad Rampersad ◽  
Jeffrey Shallit

We prove an inequality for the number of periods in a word [Formula: see text] in terms of the length of [Formula: see text] and its initial critical exponent. Next, we characterize all periods of the length-[Formula: see text] prefix of a characteristic Sturmian word in terms of the lazy Ostrowski representation of [Formula: see text], and use this result to show that our inequality is tight for infinitely many words [Formula: see text]. We propose two related measures of periodicity for infinite words. Finally, we also consider special cases where [Formula: see text] is overlap-free or squarefree.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document