scholarly journals Quasi-periodic configurations and undecidable dynamics for tilings, infinite words and Turing machines

2004 ◽  
Vol 319 (1-3) ◽  
pp. 127-143 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jean-Charles Delvenne ◽  
Vincent D. Blondel
Author(s):  
Léo Exibard ◽  
Emmanuel Filiot ◽  
Pierre-Alain Reynier

AbstractIn this paper, we investigate the problem of synthesizing computable functions of infinite words over an infinite alphabet (data $$\omega $$ ω -words). The notion of computability is defined through Turing machines with infinite inputs which can produce the corresponding infinite outputs in the limit. We use non-deterministic transducers equipped with registers, an extension of register automata with outputs, to specify functions. Such transducers may not define functions but more generally relations of data $$\omega $$ ω -words, and we show that it is PSpace-complete to test whether a given transducer defines a function. Then, given a function defined by some register transducer, we show that it is decidable (and again, PSpace-c) whether such function is computable. As for the known finite alphabet case, we show that computability and continuity coincide for functions defined by register transducers, and show how to decide continuity. We also define a subclass for which those problems are PTime.


2018 ◽  
Vol 29 (05) ◽  
pp. 825-843 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jörg Endrullis ◽  
Juhani Karhumäki ◽  
Jan Willem Klop ◽  
Aleksi Saarela

We study finite-state transducers and their power for transforming infinite words. Infinite sequences of symbols are of paramount importance in a wide range of fields, from formal languages to pure mathematics and physics. While finite automata for recognising and transforming languages are well-understood, very little is known about the power of automata to transform infinite words. The word transformation realised by finite-state transducers gives rise to a complexity comparison of words and thereby induces equivalence classes, called (transducer) degrees, and a partial order on these degrees. The ensuing hierarchy of degrees is analogous to the recursion-theoretic degrees of unsolvability, also known as Turing degrees, where the transformational devices are Turing machines. However, as a complexity measure, Turing machines are too strong: they trivialise the classification problem by identifying all computable words. Finite-state transducers give rise to a much more fine-grained, discriminating hierarchy. In contrast to Turing degrees, hardly anything is known about transducer degrees, in spite of their naturality. We use methods from linear algebra and analysis to show that there are infinitely many atoms in the transducer degrees, that is, minimal non-trivial degrees.


2022 ◽  
Vol 183 (3-4) ◽  
pp. 243-291
Author(s):  
Olivier Finkel ◽  
Michał Skrzypczak

We prove that ω-languages of (non-deterministic) Petri nets and ω-languages of (nondeterministic) Turing machines have the same topological complexity: the Borel and Wadge hierarchies of the class of ω-languages of (non-deterministic) Petri nets are equal to the Borel and Wadge hierarchies of the class of ω-languages of (non-deterministic) Turing machines. We also show that it is highly undecidable to determine the topological complexity of a Petri net ω-language. Moreover, we infer from the proofs of the above results that the equivalence and the inclusion problems for ω-languages of Petri nets are ∏21-complete, hence also highly undecidable. Additionally, we show that the situation is quite the opposite when considering unambiguous Petri nets, which have the semantic property that at most one accepting run exists on every input. We provide a procedure of determinising them into deterministic Muller counter machines with counter copying. As a consequence, we entail that the ω-languages recognisable by unambiguous Petri nets are △30 sets.


Author(s):  
Raymundo Morado ◽  
Francisco Hernández-Quiroz

Turing machines as a model of intelligence can be motivated under some assumptions, both mathematical and philosophical. Some of these are about the possibility, the necessity, and the limits of representing problem solving by mechanical means. The assumptions about representation that we consider in this paper are related to information representability and availability, processing as solving, nonessentiality of complexity issues, and finiteness, discreteness and sequentiality of the representation. We discuss these assumptions and particularly something that might happen if they were to be rejected or weakened. Tinkering with these assumptions sheds light on the import of alternative computational models.


2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rajendra K. Bera

It now appears that quantum computers are poised to enter the world of computing and establish its dominance, especially, in the cloud. Turing machines (classical computers) tied to the laws of classical physics will not vanish from our lives but begin to play a subordinate role to quantum computers tied to the enigmatic laws of quantum physics that deal with such non-intuitive phenomena as superposition, entanglement, collapse of the wave function, and teleportation, all occurring in Hilbert space. The aim of this 3-part paper is to introduce the readers to a core set of quantum algorithms based on the postulates of quantum mechanics, and reveal the amazing power of quantum computing.


2020 ◽  
Vol 46 (6) ◽  
pp. 428-432
Author(s):  
S. S. Marchenkov ◽  
S. D. Makeev
Keyword(s):  

1992 ◽  
Vol 44 (2) ◽  
pp. 272-286 ◽  
Author(s):  
Johannes Kobler ◽  
Uwe Schïng ◽  
Seinosuke Toda ◽  
Jacobo Torán
Keyword(s):  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document