Interpreting and Negotiating Conflicts of Interests in the Analytic Relationship: A Discussion of Salee Jenkins's Clinical Case

2013 ◽  
pp. 99-124
2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (4) ◽  
pp. 463-465
Author(s):  
S. N. Danielyan ◽  
E. V. Tatarinova ◽  
E. A. Tarabrin ◽  
G. A. Nefyodova

We report a rare clinical case of spontaneous rupture of the aneurysm left gastroepiploic artery with life-threatening intra-abdominal haemorrhage.Authors declare lack of the conflicts of interests. 


2021 ◽  
pp. 80-83
Author(s):  
O.V. Ryzhenko ◽  
◽  
O.V. Perederiy ◽  

Gastrointestinal foreign bodies in children are a common reason for emergency surgical care. Among the foreign bodies of the digestive tract, special attention should be paid to neodymium magnets, known for their strong magnetic abilities and high resistance to demagnetization. The usual age of hospitalized children with intestinal magnetic bodies is 2–4 years. Swallowing neodymium balls can be accompanied with perforation, fistula, intestinal obstruction, peritonitis, shot bowel syndrome; septic condition with fatalities. The article presents a clinical case of swallowing 17 magnets by two-years-old boy for a long time. The child was hospitalized without anamnestic date of foreign bodies to the digestive tract. Intestinal magnets were diagnosed radiological. Early surgery with gentle tactics was used. The child recovered. The research was carried out in accordance with the principles of the Helsinki Declaration. The study protocol was approved by the Local Ethics Committee of these Institutes. The informed consent of the patient was obtained for conducting the studies. The authors declare no conflicts of interests. Key words: foreign bodies of digestive tract, perforation, magnets.


1995 ◽  
Vol 22 ◽  
pp. 29-35
Author(s):  
Jennifer Gutierrez ◽  
Anthony Caruso

2015 ◽  
Vol 21 ◽  
pp. 108-109
Author(s):  
Ana Abaroa-Salvatierra ◽  
Arti Patel ◽  
Mrunalini Deshmukh
Keyword(s):  

2003 ◽  
Vol 19 (3) ◽  
pp. 164-174 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stephen N. Haynes ◽  
Andrew E. Williams

Summary: We review the rationale for behavioral clinical case formulations and emphasize the role of the functional analysis in the design of individualized treatments. Standardized treatments may not be optimally effective for clients who have multiple behavior problems. These problems can affect each other in complex ways and each behavior problem can be influenced by multiple, interacting causal variables. The mechanisms of action of standardized treatments may not always address the most important causal variables for a client's behavior problems. The functional analysis integrates judgments about the client's behavior problems, important causal variables, and functional relations among variables. The functional analysis aids treatment decisions by helping the clinician estimate the relative magnitude of effect of each causal variable on the client's behavior problems, so that the most effective treatments can be selected. The parameters of, and issues associated with, a functional analysis and Functional Analytic Clinical Case Models (FACCM) are illustrated with a clinical case. The task of selecting the best treatment for a client is complicated because treatments differ in their level of specificity and have unequally weighted mechanisms of action. Further, a treatment's mechanism of action is often unknown.


1995 ◽  
Author(s):  
George E. Abbott ◽  
◽  
Ray William London ◽  
Irving Kirsch

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document