Government rhetoric and student understandings: discursive framings of higher education ‘choice’: Rachel Brooks

2013 ◽  
pp. 250-265
2009 ◽  
Vol 12 (3) ◽  
pp. 209-224 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tina Byrom

Whilst there has been growing attention paid to the imbalance of Higher Education (HE) applications according to social class, insufficient attention has been paid to the successful minority of working-class young people who do secure places in some of the UK’s leading HE institutions. In particular, the influence and nature of pre-university interventions on such students’ choice of institution has been under-explored. Data from an ESRC-funded PhD study of 16 young people who participated in a Sutton Trust Summer School are used to illustrate how the effects of a school-based institutional habitus and directed intervention programmes can be instrumental in guiding student choices and decisions relating to participation in Higher Education.


2019 ◽  
Vol 79 (6) ◽  
pp. 1001-1021
Author(s):  
Jonne Pieter Vulperhorst ◽  
Roeland Matthijs van der Rijst ◽  
Sanne Floor Akkerman

Abstract Recent studies have shown that students’ interests are decisive in making a substantiated higher education choice, yet do not indicate how students decide which interests they aim to pursue. This study aimed to find the considerations students have when weighing interests and higher education programmes. Thematic analysis was applied to uncover considerations based on semi-structured interviews with 20 Dutch high-school seniors. Students weighed their interests from an interest-to-programme perspective (contrasting interests and deciding which is most important for their future) and from a programme-to-interest perspective (evaluating how possible programmes reconcile with one’s interests). By applying both perspectives simultaneously, students dynamically considered which programmes and interests they wished to pursue. These findings imply that higher education choice theory and studies should acknowledge that the programmes and interests students consider are dependent on the feed forward of the considered interests on programmes and the feed back of considered programmes on interests.


2006 ◽  
Vol 31 (4) ◽  
pp. 459-469 ◽  
Author(s):  
José María Cubillo-Pinilla ◽  
Joaquin Sánchez-Herrera ◽  
Waldo S. Pérez-Aguir

2002 ◽  
Vol 50 (3) ◽  
pp. 398-418 ◽  
Author(s):  
Diane Reay

The stated UK Government policy on Higher Education is to attract increasing numbers of non-traditional applicants to Higher Education. Mature students are positioned as key within this policy initiative. However, the statistics suggest that recent policy changes have made it more rather than less difficult for non-traditional students to attend university. This paper explores some of the sociological and psychological processes which make working-class transitions to higher education problematic by focusing on the narratives of 23 mature students attending an inner London Further Education college. It is argued that class, although mediated by gender and ethnicity, always counts in the transition process. Also, within the working-classes there are different class fractions with differing priorities in relation to risk, challenge and fitting in. These solidarist and individualist fractions within the working-classes result in differing priorities, attitudes and actions in relation to the higher education choice process.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document