Objective fact and psychological truth: Some thoughts on “recovered memory”

2018 ◽  
pp. 179-184
Author(s):  
Patrick Casement
2007 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anne M. Sorgi ◽  
Craig E. Hunt ◽  
Katherine Lee ◽  
Sara C. Jakl ◽  
David R. Gerkens

1997 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 131-154 ◽  
Author(s):  
Amina Memon ◽  
Mark Young
Keyword(s):  

2018 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
pp. 22-24 ◽  
Author(s):  
Steven Jay Lynn ◽  
Harald Merckelbach ◽  
Craig P. Polizzi

In this comment on Patihis and Pendergrast (this issue, p. 3), we challenge an assumption that underpins recovered memory therapies: that there exists a close link of traumatic experiences with dissociation. We further suggest that (a) researchers examine how therapists who believe in repressed memories instill this belief in clients and establish expectations that current problems can be interpreted in light of past traumatic experiences, (b) recovered memories could be classified and studied as a function of how events come to light and are interpreted, and (c) therapists routinely provide informed consent regarding recovered memories and suggestive techniques.


1997 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
pp. 39-45 ◽  
Author(s):  
Connie M. Kristiansen ◽  
Susan J. Haslip ◽  
Katharine D. Kelly
Keyword(s):  

2005 ◽  
Vol 16 (4) ◽  
pp. 336-340 ◽  
Author(s):  
Richard J. McNally ◽  
Carel S. Ristuccia ◽  
Carol A. Perlman

According to betrayal trauma theory, adult survivors of childhood sexual abuse (CSA) who were molested by their caretakers (e.g., a father) are especially likely to dissociate (“repress”) their memories of abuse. Testing college students, some reporting CSA, DePrince and Freyd (2004) found that those scoring high on a dissociation questionnaire exhibited memory deficits for trauma words when they viewed these words under divided-attention conditions. Replicating DePrince and Freyd's procedure, we tested for memory deficits for trauma words relative to neutral words in adults reporting either continuous or recovered memories of CSA versus adults denying a history of CSA. A memory deficit for trauma words under divided attention was expected in the recovered-memory group. Results were inconsistent with this prediction, as all three groups exhibited better recall of trauma words than neutral words, irrespective of encoding conditions.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document