Two Letters on Preventive War [1950–51]

Author(s):  
Andrew G. Bone
Keyword(s):  
2003 ◽  
Author(s):  
David J. Luban
Keyword(s):  

2015 ◽  
Vol 61 (8) ◽  
pp. 1711-1739 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniel McCormack ◽  
Henry Pascoe
Keyword(s):  

Author(s):  
Paul K. MacDonald ◽  
Joseph M. Parent

This chapter reviews the literature and lays out the debate on decline. It divides the rival views into two main camps: preventive war and domestic dysfunction. For preventive war theorists, who include power transition and hegemonic stability theorists, there are strong international incentives for falling states to stave off their declines through aggressive or inflexible policies that culminate in war. For scholars of domestic dysfunction, decentralization, paralysis, or hijacking by special interests are likely to block prompt and proportionate strategic adjustment. This chapter questions the logic and evidence of each.


2014 ◽  
Vol 41 (1) ◽  
pp. 69-76 ◽  
Author(s):  
Deen Chatterjee
Keyword(s):  

Author(s):  
Paul K. MacDonald ◽  
Joseph M. Parent

This chapter sums the arguments and findings of the book, and relates them to the debate on decline, especially the implications for preventive war and domestic dysfunction theories. It then pivots to apply these findings to discussions about how fast the United States is falling, how it is responding to decline, and what the consequences are likely to be.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document