From Fort Sumter to Appomattox: How did the War Progress?

2021 ◽  
pp. 89-101
Author(s):  
Janice I. Robbins ◽  
Carol L. Tieso
Keyword(s):  
Author(s):  
William B. Kurtz

When the Confederacy fired on Fort Sumter, Catholic northerners rallied to save the Union from its greatest threat. Some hoped that immigrant and Catholic bravery and sacrifice on the battlefield would forever end anti-Catholic nativism in America. As conservatives and Democrats, they also strongly resisted attempts to enlarge the purpose of the war, especially on the issue of emancipating southern slaves. Remembering the connections between antislavery politics and anti-Catholic nativism in the antebellum North, they feared Republicans’ attacks on slavery might be followed by assaults on their rights as naturalized citizens and Catholics. The most prominent pro-Union leaders in the North were the Irish Americans Archbishop John Hughes (1797–1864) of New York and the Bostonian Patrick Donahoe (1811–1901), owner of the widely published newspaper the Boston Pilot. Together these two men led Catholic conservatives’ fight to restore the Union as it was before the outbreak of war.


1941 ◽  
Vol 28 (1) ◽  
pp. 63
Author(s):  
David Rankin Barbee ◽  
Milledge L. Bonham
Keyword(s):  

1981 ◽  
Vol 86 (4) ◽  
pp. 929
Author(s):  
Michael C. C. Adams ◽  
Stephen Z. Starr
Keyword(s):  

2016 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wesley Moody
Keyword(s):  

Author(s):  
Michael D. Robinson

Many accounts of the secession crisis overlook the sharp political conflict that took place in the Border South states of Delaware, Kentucky, Maryland, and Missouri. Michael D. Robinson expands the scope of this crisis to show how the fate of the Border South, and with it the Union, desperately hung in the balance during the fateful months surrounding the clash at Fort Sumter. During this period, Border South politicians revealed the region’s deep commitment to slavery, disputed whether or not to leave the Union, and schemed to win enough support to carry the day. Although these border states contained fewer enslaved people than the eleven states that seceded, white border Southerners chose to remain in the Union because they felt the decision best protected their peculiar institution. Robinson reveals anew how the choice for Union was fraught with anguish and uncertainty, dividing families and producing years of bitter internecine violence. Letters, diaries, newspapers, and quantitative evidence illuminate how, in the absence of a compromise settlement, proslavery Unionists managed to defeat secession in the Border South.


1911 ◽  
Vol 20 (2) ◽  
pp. 69
Author(s):  
Edmund Ruffin
Keyword(s):  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document