Competitive balance

Author(s):  
Bradley J. Baker
Keyword(s):  
2021 ◽  
Vol 103 (5) ◽  
Author(s):  
R. Masoumi ◽  
F. Oloomi ◽  
A. Kargaran ◽  
A. Hosseiny ◽  
G. R. Jafari

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-20
Author(s):  
Sarthak Mondal ◽  
Daniel Plumley ◽  
Rob Wilson
Keyword(s):  

2011 ◽  
Vol 49 (2) ◽  
pp. 464-473 ◽  
Author(s):  
RODNEY FORT ◽  
JAMES QUIRK

2018 ◽  
Vol 50 (46) ◽  
pp. 4925-4936 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. Alan Bowman ◽  
James Lambrinos ◽  
Thomas Ashman

1980 ◽  
Vol 16 (2) ◽  
pp. 117-125 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. W. Willey ◽  
M. R. Rao

SUMMARYA simple competitive ratio (CR) is proposed as a measure of intercrop competition, to indicate the number of times by which one component crop is more competitive than the other. Intercropping data show that this CR term could be useful in (i) comparing the competitive ability of different crops, (ii) measuring competitive changes within a given combination, (iii) identifying which plant characters are associated with competitive ability, and (iv) determining what competitive balance between components is most likely to give maximum yield advantages.


2011 ◽  
Vol 12 (3) ◽  
pp. 256-273 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marco Runkel

Abstract This paper investigates revenue sharing in an asymmetric two-teams contest model of a sports league with Nash behavior of team owners. The innovation of the analysis is that it focuses on the role of the contest success function (CSF). In case of an inelastic talent supply, revenue sharing turns out to worsen competitive balance regardless of the shape of the CSF. For the case of an elastic talent supply, in contrast, the effect of revenue sharing on competitive balance depends on the specification of the CSF. We fully characterize the class of CSFs for which revenue sharing leaves unaltered competitive balance and identify CSFs ensuring that revenue sharing renders the contest closer.


2004 ◽  
Vol 22 (6) ◽  
pp. 783-797 ◽  
Author(s):  
Frédéric Palomino ◽  
József Sákovics
Keyword(s):  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document