Conservation, Ecology, and Management of Catfish: The Second International Symposium

<em>Abstract</em>.—Little is known about habitat requirements of juvenile flathead catfish <em>Pylodictis olivaris</em>. Previous studies indicate use of coarse substrates associated with riffle habitats in streams; however, limited information on microhabitat characteristics associated with habitat selection exists. To further our understanding of early life history habitat for flathead catfish, we used polyvinyl chloride half tubes (i.e., tubes cut in half longitudinally) of six different diameters (range, 13–76 mm) and depths (range, 25–152 mm) to simulate interstitial spaces provided by coarse substrates and determine (1) whether juvenile flathead catfish selected for interstice size, (2) relative importance of interstitial diameter and depth, and (3) if interstitial space size selection was related to fish body size. A total of 1,316 selection trials regarding interstitial diameter, depth, and the interaction of these characteristics was conducted using juvenile flathead catfish ranging in total length (TL) from 15 to 128 mm. Utilization of interstice diameters and depths was nonrandom (i.e., selection was occurring). Selection of interstice diameter was positively related to fish body size (i.e., total length), whereas all sizes of juvenile flathead catfish most often selected the greatest depth of interstitial space offered. We observed an ontogenetic shift in relative importance of interstice diameter and depth during interaction trials. Flathead catfish less than 40 mm TL selected for interstitial diameter, fish between 41 and 60 mm TL selected for both interstitial characteristics, whereas individuals larger than 60 mm TL selected for interstitial depth. Results of our study are among the first to identify microhabitat-scale characteristics that influence habitat selection by early life history stages of this species.

2020 ◽  
Vol 650 ◽  
pp. 7-18 ◽  
Author(s):  
HW Fennie ◽  
S Sponaugle ◽  
EA Daly ◽  
RD Brodeur

Predation is a major source of mortality in the early life stages of fishes and a driving force in shaping fish populations. Theoretical, modeling, and laboratory studies have generated hypotheses that larval fish size, age, growth rate, and development rate affect their susceptibility to predation. Empirical data on predator selection in the wild are challenging to obtain, and most selective mortality studies must repeatedly sample populations of survivors to indirectly examine survivorship. While valuable on a population scale, these approaches can obscure selection by particular predators. In May 2018, along the coast of Washington, USA, we simultaneously collected juvenile quillback rockfish Sebastes maliger from both the environment and the stomachs of juvenile coho salmon Oncorhynchus kisutch. We used otolith microstructure analysis to examine whether juvenile coho salmon were age-, size-, and/or growth-selective predators of juvenile quillback rockfish. Our results indicate that juvenile rockfish consumed by salmon were significantly smaller, slower growing at capture, and younger than surviving (unconsumed) juvenile rockfish, providing direct evidence that juvenile coho salmon are selective predators on juvenile quillback rockfish. These differences in early life history traits between consumed and surviving rockfish are related to timing of parturition and the environmental conditions larval rockfish experienced, suggesting that maternal effects may substantially influence survival at this stage. Our results demonstrate that variability in timing of parturition and sea surface temperature leads to tradeoffs in early life history traits between growth in the larval stage and survival when encountering predators in the pelagic juvenile stage.


2019 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniel E Winkler ◽  
Michelle Yu-Chan Lin ◽  
José Delgadillo ◽  
Kenneth J Chapin ◽  
Travis E Huxman

We studied how a rare, endemic alpine cushion plant responds to the interactive effects of warming and drought. Overall, we found that both drought and warming negatively influenced the species growth but that existing levels of phenotypic variation may be enough to at least temporarily buffer populations.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document