Restricting Transfusion Requirements in Major Orthopedic Surgery and its Alternatives

2015 ◽  
pp. 51-51
Author(s):  
Ravisha Bhardwaj ◽  
RS Boparai
2003 ◽  
Vol 98 (2) ◽  
pp. 337-342 ◽  
Author(s):  
David Amar ◽  
Florence M. Grant ◽  
Hao Zhang ◽  
Patrick J. Boland ◽  
Denis H. Leung ◽  
...  

Background Aprotinin has been reported to reduce blood loss and transfusion requirements in patients having major orthopedic operations. Data on whether epsilon amino-caproic acid (EACA) is effective in this population are sparse. Methods Sixty-nine adults with malignancy scheduled for either pelvic, extremity or spine surgery during general anesthesia entered this randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, and received either intravenous aprotinin (n = 23), bolus of 2 x 10(6) kallikrein inactivator units (KIU), followed by an infusion of 5 x 10(5) KIU/h, or EACA (n = 22), bolus of 150 mg/kg, followed by a 15 mg/kg/h infusion or saline placebo (n = 24) during surgery. Our goal was to determine whether prophylactic EACA or aprotinin therapy would reduce perioperative blood loss (intraoperative + first 48h) >30% when compared to placebo. Results The mean age of the study population was 52 +/- 17 yr. The groups did not differ in age, duration of surgery, perioperative blood loss or number of packed erythrocyte units transfused. When compared to the placebo group, the two treated groups had a significantly lower D-Dimer level immediately after surgery, P < 0.01. Conclusions Under the conditions of this study, we were unable to find a clinical benefit to using aprotinin or EACA to reduce perioperative blood loss or transfusion requirements during major orthopedic surgery in cancer patients.


1998 ◽  
Vol 88 (1) ◽  
pp. 50-57 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xavier Capdevila ◽  
Yves Calvet ◽  
Philippe Biboulet ◽  
Christine Biron ◽  
Josh Rubenovitch ◽  
...  

Background Major orthopedic surgery can be associated with dramatic blood loss, thereby requiring high-volume homologous transfusions in patients unable to benefit from blood salvage techniques. The effect of aprotinin on blood loss and transfusion requirements during orthopedic surgery for either the resection of malignancies of the removal of infected hardware was prospectively studied. Methods Twenty-three patients scheduled for orthopedic surgery of the hip, femur, or pelvis for sepsis or malignant tumors, all under general anesthesia, were randomly allocated to receive during operation, in a blinded manner, either aprotinin administered as a bolus of 1.106 kallikrein inactivation units (KIU) followed by an infusion of 5 x 10(5) KIU/h, or the equivalent volume of saline. The anesthesia and perioperative management, as well as the designated transfusion criteria, were standardized. The total blood loss of each patient was evaluated using intraoperative suction losses, sponge weights, and postoperative volumetric drainage. Homologous transfusion requirements were noted. Hemoglobin and hematocrit measures, as well as coagulation and fibrinolytic pathway explorations, were performed before and after surgery. Deep venous thrombosis prophylaxis was applied, and the incidence of this complication was assessed. Results Twelve patients received aprotinin. Aprotinin reduced the total blood loss from a median of 5,305 ml (range, 3,000-9,770 ml) to a median of 1,783 ml (range, 1,140-4,955 ml; P < 0.05). A blood loss reduction of 56% during surgery and 68% on discharge from the postanesthesia care unit was observed. Seven units (range, 4-16) of packed erythrocytes were transfused per patient in the placebo group, and 3 (range, 2-5) were transfused in the aprotinin group (P < 0.05). In the aprotinin group, platelet counts were higher, and postoperative prothrombin times and D. Dimer values were lower. The activated partial thromboplastin time values showed no significant difference between the two groups. No side effects were observed in the aprotinin group. A deep venous thrombosis developed in one patient in the placebo group. Conclusion Aprotinin treatment during major orthopedic surgery significantly reduces both blood loss and consequent homologous blood transfusion requirements.


1999 ◽  
Vol 82 (08) ◽  
pp. 918-924 ◽  
Author(s):  
R.D. Hull ◽  
G.F Pineo

IntroductionMajor orthopedic surgery, particularly total joint replacement or hip fracture, represents a high risk of future development of postoperative venous thromboembolism and warrants the routine use of prophylaxis with either mechanical devices or pharmacological agents. The aim of prophylaxis is to prevent fatal pulmonary embolism (PE) and the morbidity of deep vein thrombosis (DVT), particularly the development of post-thrombotic syndrome. Patterns of clinical practice, with respect to the prevention of venous thromboembolism and the appropriate use of anticoagulants for the treatment of thrombotic disease, have been strongly influenced by recent consensus conferences.1,2 Rules of evidence for assessing the literature have been applied to all recommendations regarding the prevention and treatment of thrombotic disease. These results were extrapolated using evidence gleaned from major clinical disorders and are based only on nonrandomized clinical trials or case series.1-3 Data from a large number of Level I clinical trials in patients undergoing orthopedic surgery have provided answers to many of the questions regarding prophylaxis of venous thromboembolism. In this review, we will discuss the prevention of venous thromboembolism following orthopedic surgery and discuss some of the controversial issues where further studies are required.


2016 ◽  
Vol 103 (5) ◽  
pp. 560-566 ◽  
Author(s):  
Toshio Yamaguchi ◽  
Hideo Wada ◽  
Shinichi Miyazaki ◽  
Masahiro Hasegawa ◽  
Hiroki Wakabayashi ◽  
...  

2010 ◽  
Vol 44 (6) ◽  
pp. 1061-1071 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stephanie N Melillo ◽  
James V Scanlon ◽  
Benjamin P Exter ◽  
Michael Steinberg ◽  
Courtney I Jarvis

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document