2020 ◽  
pp. 111-128
Author(s):  
Catherine Phillips

Literary influence is rarely as simple as locating the language of one writer in the work of another. Often it comes by way of, or in correspondence with, other writers, part of a chorus of influence. In Geoffrey Hill’s poetry, Gerard Manley Hopkins’s voice is part of the polyphonic, interweaving echoes that the reader detects. Hill’s allusions to Hopkins come in clusters and compounds, leaving the reader to tease out threads and affinities. Hill’s poetic texture is a particularly dense one of layer upon layer of allusion, each adding through its context to the poem’s meaning. Hill’s allusions to Hopkins often recall stylistic features of other poets as well, including T. S. Eliot and W. B. Yeats. This layering of ghostly echoes informs Hill’s own ambiguity, word formations, visual perceptions, and imagery to complicate his unique voice even as it animates and strengthens it.


Author(s):  
John Llewelyn

The Early Mediaeval Scottish philosopher and theologian John Duns Scotus shook traditional doctrines of logical universality and logical particularity by arguing for a metaphysics of ‘formal distinction’. Why did the Nineteenth Century poet and self-styled philosopher Gerard Manley Hopkins find this revolutionary teaching so appealing? John Llewelyn answers this question by casting light on various neologisms introduced by Hopkins and reveals how Hopkins endorses Scotus’s claim that being and existence are grounded in doing and willing. Drawing on modern respon ses to Scotus made by Heidegger, Peirce, Arendt, Leibniz, Hume, Reid, Derrida and Deleuze, Llewelyn’s own response shows by way of bonus why it would be a pity to suppose that the rewards of reading Scotus and Hopkins are available only to those who share their theological presuppositions


2018 ◽  
Vol 13 (4) ◽  
pp. 496-517
Author(s):  
Ned Hercock

This essay examines the objects in George Oppen's Discrete Series (1934). It considers their primary property to be their hardness – many of them have distinctively uniform and impenetrable surfaces. This hardness and uniformity is contrasted with 19th century organicism (Gerard Manley Hopkins and John Ruskin). Taking my cue from Kirsten Blythe Painter I show how in their work with hard objects these poems participate within a wider cultural and philosophical turn towards hardness in the early twentieth century (Marcel Duchamp, Adolf Loos, Ludwig Wittgenstein and others). I describe the thinking these poems do with regard to industrialization and to human experience of a resolutely object world – I argue that the presentation of these objects bears witness to the production history of the type of objects which in this era are becoming preponderant in parts of the world. Finally, I suggest that the objects’ impenetrability offers a kind of anti-aesthetic relief: perception without conception. If ‘philosophy recognizes the Concept in everything’ it is still possible, these poems show, to experience resistance to this imperious process of conceptualization. Within thinking objects (poems) these are objects which do not think.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document