The nun, the rape charge and the miscarriage of justice: the case of Nora Wall

2020 ◽  
Vol 59 (3) ◽  
pp. 305-325
Author(s):  
Catherine O'Sullivan

N/A

2018 ◽  
Vol 49 (2) ◽  
pp. 245
Author(s):  
Susan Glazebrook

This article examines the role expert evidence plays in court and some of the risks surrounding such evidence. Through the examination of several tragic cases of miscarriage of justice, this article warns of the dangers of relying unquestionably on expert evidence and calls for a careful consideration of the evidence as each case comes before the courts. The value of good forensic evidence in the investigation and prosecution of crime is nevertheless recognised.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
◽  
Tara Schoeller-Burke

<p>This paper discusses the wrongful imprisonment of the Guildford Four, and the reasons why this miscarriage of justice occurred. Contrary to popular opinion that the injustice arose due to police malpractice, this paper will conclude that the blame lies primarily with the judiciary for failing to reverse the 1975 decision even in the face of what seemed to be insurmountable contradictory evidence. This paper analyses the role each branch of government played, as well as discussing the role of public perceptions and societal fears of the time.</p>


Author(s):  
Clooney Amal ◽  
Webb Philippa

This chapter studies the right to examine witnesses, which is fundamental to an effective defence. Allowing a prosecution witness to submit uncontested testimony, or depriving a defendant of the opportunity to call a witness who can provide exculpatory evidence, can lead to a serious miscarriage of justice. The right also protects the interests of victims, witnesses, and the broader public, because the questioning of witnesses can help to establish the truth and ensure the integrity of the judicial process. Under international human rights law, the right includes two components: the defendant’s right to examine witnesses testifying against them, and the right to call witnesses in their defence. But neither component of the right is absolute. This chapter addresses guidance from international bodies on acceptable limitations to the right, including areas of divergence relating to the use of anonymous witness testimony. It also highlights the challenge of obtaining remedies for such violations from international bodies given their deference to national courts on matters of evidence.


1994 ◽  
Vol 47 (2) ◽  
pp. 282-329 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrew Gow ◽  
Gordon Griffiths

In his Eulogy of Florence (Laudatio Florentinae Urbis) Leonardo Bruni praised her constitution for giving first place to justice, “without which no city can exist or deserve the name.” Moreover, he said, “Not only citizens, but aliens as well are protected by this commonwealth. It suffers injury to be done to no man, and endeavors to see to it that everyone, citizen or alien, shall receive the justice that is owing to him.” During Brum's own tenure as chancellor of Florence, however, we hear of a Jewish banker who was ruined by the heaviest fine in the history of the city after a trial that one modern scholar has described as a monstrous miscarriage of justice.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document