Outcomes in Multidisciplinary Team-based Approach in Geriatric Hip Fracture Care: A Systematic Review

2020 ◽  
Vol 28 (3) ◽  
pp. 128-133 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jay N. Patel ◽  
David S. Klein ◽  
Swathy Sreekumar ◽  
Frank A. Liporace ◽  
Richard S. Yoon
2019 ◽  
Vol 27 (1) ◽  
pp. e33-e40 ◽  
Author(s):  
Matthew R. Boylan ◽  
Aldo M. Riesgo ◽  
Carl B. Paulino ◽  
Nirmal C. Tejwani

2016 ◽  
Vol 128 (S7) ◽  
pp. 527-534 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dejan Krušič ◽  
Drago Brilej ◽  
Colin Currie ◽  
Radko Komadina

Injury ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 47 (12) ◽  
pp. 2755-2759 ◽  
Author(s):  
Amrut Borade ◽  
Harish Kempegowda ◽  
Akhil Tawari ◽  
Michael Suk ◽  
Daniel S. Horwitz

2018 ◽  
Vol 29 (9) ◽  
pp. 1963-1985 ◽  
Author(s):  
S.C. Voeten ◽  
P. Krijnen ◽  
D.M. Voeten ◽  
J.H. Hegeman ◽  
M.W.J.M. Wouters ◽  
...  

PLoS ONE ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 16 (12) ◽  
pp. e0261279
Author(s):  
Alexander Lee ◽  
Sara Weintraub ◽  
Ianto Lin Xi ◽  
Jaimo Ahn ◽  
Joseph Bernstein

Background Displaced femoral neck fractures in geriatric patients are typically treated with either hemiarthroplasty or total hip arthroplasty. The choice between hemiarthroplasty and total hip arthroplasty requires a good estimate of the patient’s life expectancy, as the recent HEALTH trial suggests that the benefits of the two operations do not diverge, if at all, until the second year post-operatively. A systematic review was this performed to determine if there sufficient information in the medical literature to estimate a patient’s life expectancy beyond two years and to identify those patient variables affecting survival of that duration. Methods Pubmed, Embase, and Cochrane databases were queried for articles reporting survival data for at least two years post-operatively for at least 100 patients, age 65 or greater, treated surgically for an isolated hip fracture. A final set of 43 papers was created. The methods section of all selected papers was then reviewed to determine which variables were collected in the studies and the results section was reviewed to note whether an effect was reported for all collected variables. Results There were 43 eligible studies with 25 unique variables identified. Only age, gender, comorbidities, the presence of dementia and fracture type were collected in a majority of studies, and within that, only age and gender were reported in a majority of the results. Most (15/ 25) variables were reported in 5 or fewer of the studies. Discussion There are important deficiencies in the literature precluding the evidence-based estimation of 2 year life expectancy. Because the ostensible advantages of total hip arthroplasty are reaped only by those who survive two years or more, there is a need for additional data collection, analysis and reporting regarding survival after geriatric hip fracture.


Author(s):  
Maic Werner ◽  
Christian Macke ◽  
Manfred Gogol ◽  
Christian Krettek ◽  
Emmanouil Liodakis

Abstract Purpose Hip fractures are of growing interest due to their increasing number, subsequent functional decline and high institutionalization rate of patients, mortality, and costs. Several process measurements are essential for hip fracture care. To compare and improve these, hip fracture registries in Europe became popular. This systematic review aims to describe the differences between hip fracture registries in Europe as well as the differences in hip fracture treatment between countries. Methods A systematic search using the keywords “hip fracture” AND “national” AND “database OR audit OR registry OR register” was performed in PubMed, Embase and Cochrane Library according to PRISMA guidelines till 3rd December 2020. Recent annual reports of identified hip fracture registries in Europe were additionally identified in June 2021. Comparisons of most common case-mix, process and outcome measurements were performed. Results 11 registries in Europe were identified. Differences were observed regarding inclusion criteria of the different registries. Comparison of the different registries was difficult due to differences in the way to report measurements. While mortality rates differed substantially between countries, most of the process measurements met recommendations according to recent guidelines. Conclusion Hip fracture registries were a valid tool to compare hospitals within one country. However, a comparison between registries of different countries should have also been easily possible. For this, the registries need to make their data easily accessible and further unify their way of measuring and reporting.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document