Comparing the effects of bascom's cleft lift and crystallized phenol treatment on Type III-V Pilonidal Sinus Disease

The objective of the study was to compare the results of the patients treated with crystallized phenol treatment (CPT) or simple primary closure (SPC) for pilonidal sinus disease (PSD). For PSD treatment, both SPC and CPT have the advantages of rapid recovery, minimal pain, and short hospital stay. Even though these two techniques can be used interchangeably in uncomplicated cases, there is not enough evidence about which method is superior. A total of 102 patients who underwent CPT (n = 57) and SPC (n = 45) for uncomplicated PSD were included in the study. In all of the cases, data were recorded and compared between CPT and SPC groups, including age, gender, duration of the symptoms, hospital stay, complications, healing time, and recurrence. The mean age was 25.6 years and the male-to-female ratio was 93:9. The SPC and CPT groups were similar in terms of age, gender, duration of symptoms, complications, and healing time. The CPT group did not require hospitalization or anesthetic procedure in addition to local anesthesia, but the SPC group required a median of 1 day (range, 1–3 days) of hospitalization, and 3 patients (6.7%) needed spinal anesthesia. During a median of 27.5 months' follow-up, the recurrence rate in the CPT group (6 patients; 10.5%) was lower than in the SPC group (13 patients; 28.9%). Both hospital stay and recurrence rates were better in the CPT group. Healing time and complication rates were similar in both methods. Based on these results, we suggest that CPT should be preferred to SPC in uncomplicated cases.

Download Full-text

Does hair removal necessary after crystallized phenol treatment in pilonidal disease?

Medical Principles and Practice ◽

10.1159/000516903 ◽

2021 ◽

Author(s):

Süleyman Kargın ◽

Osman Doğru ◽

Ersin Turan

Keyword(s):

Pilonidal Sinus ◽

Pilonidal Disease ◽

Area Under The Curve ◽

Hair Removal ◽

Pilonidal Sinus Disease ◽

Sinus Disease ◽

Removal Time ◽

Application Data ◽

Phenol Treatment ◽

Crystallized Phenol

Objective: The most important cause of post-treatment recurrence in the pilonidal sinus is the re-entry of hair into the skin. The study aimed to investigate the effect of hair removal and its duration on the prevention of recurrences after crystallized phenol treatment. Subject and Methods: The patients with pilonidal sinus disease who were treated with crystallized phenol treatment were evaluated. Hair in the sacrococcygeal area were removed with depilatory cream before every crystallized phenol procedure, during the treatment, and after treatment once a month for six years. Of 1016 patients, 735 were contacted by telephone or e-mail regarding the frequency of sacrococcygeal hair removal and recurrence. Demographic and sinus features and crystallized phenol application data of patients treated with crystallized phenol for pilonidal sinus disease, as well as recurrences were retrospectively assessed. Results: The mean follow-up time was 46.23 ± 33 (range, 11–240) months, with 139 (18.9%) patients experiencing recurrence. Patients who underwent hair removal experienced significantly less recurrence than those who did not (p = 0.003, odds ratio (OR): 0.54 [0.36–0.82]). The OR of recurrence decreased by 0.8% every month as the hair removal time increased (OR = 0.992, 95% CI = 0.985-1.000, p = 0.049). The cut-off value for sensitivity was 0.636, specificity 0.466, and area under the curve 0.562 in hair removal procedures that lasted for over 30 months. Conclusion: Regular hair removal during and at least 30 months after crystallized phenol treatment reduced recurrences in patients with pilonidal sinus disease.

Download Full-text