Regulating Creativity: Why and How Leader Regulatory Focus Influences Employee Creativity

2014 ◽  
Vol 2014 (1) ◽  
pp. 12040
Author(s):  
Ramzi Said ◽  
Bernard Nijstad
2013 ◽  
Vol 2013 (1) ◽  
pp. 11420
Author(s):  
Ramzi Said ◽  
Bernard Nijstad ◽  
Onne Janssen ◽  
Laetitia Mulder

2016 ◽  
Vol 37 (5) ◽  
pp. 579-592 ◽  
Author(s):  
Feng-Cheng Tung ◽  
Tsu-Wei Yu

Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to develop a greater understanding of the effect of innovation leadership (participative, supportive, and instrumental) on supervisory-rated employee creativity through greater employee regulatory focus (i.e. promotion and prevention). Design/methodology/approach – Data were collected from dyads of 103 employees and employee supervisors working in Taiwan’s high-tech industry. A structural equation modelling approach was used to examine the relationship posited in this study. Findings – Results reveal that both participative and supportive leadership are positively associated with the creativity of supervisory-rated subordinates when those subordinates adopted a focus on promotion. The data also show that these relationships are partially mediated by employee promotion focus. At the same time, the positive relationship between instrumental leadership and employee creativity is fully mediated by employee prevention focus. Originality/value – The results of this study show that participative and supportive leaders cultivate employee promotion focus, which then enhances employee creativity. Instrumental leaders will induce employee prevention focus, which also enhances employee creativity. These findings imply that when enhancing employee creativity, employees with a promotion focus are more suited to participative and supportive leaders, while employees who do not have a promotion focus may be more suited to leaders who provide these employees with specific instructions on the rules, regulations, and procedures to follow to accomplish given tasks and common goals.


2007 ◽  
Vol 2007 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-6
Author(s):  
Cindy Wu ◽  
Jeffery S. McMullen ◽  
Mitchell J. Neubert

2006 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ju-Chien Cindy Wu ◽  
Jeffery S. McMullen ◽  
Mitchell J. Neubert ◽  
Xiang Yi

2008 ◽  
Vol 23 (5) ◽  
pp. 587-602 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cindy Wu ◽  
Jeffery S. McMullen ◽  
Mitchell J. Neubert ◽  
Xiang Yi

2018 ◽  
Vol 28 (2) ◽  
pp. 228-249 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zizhen Geng ◽  
Caifeng Li ◽  
Kejia Bi ◽  
Haiping Zheng ◽  
Xia Yang

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to advance our understanding of the roles that service employees’ responses to high job demands play in service innovation, by examining the effects that service employees’ motivational orientation in self-regulation (regulatory focus) and their emotional labour strategy have on their creativity. Design/methodology/approach By integrating regulatory focus theory and emotion regulation theory, the authors developed a theoretical model to propose the links between promotion and prevention regulatory foci, different emotional labour strategies and frontline employee creativity. The research hypotheses were tested using hierarchical linear model based on data collected from 304 frontline employees and 72 supervisors in 51 restaurants. Findings The results showed that promotion focus was positively related to frontline employee creativity while prevention focus was negatively related to it. In addition, both emotional labour strategies (deep acting and surface acting) mediated the effect of promotion focus on frontline employee creativity. Surface acting mediated the effect of prevention focus on frontline employee creativity. Originality/value This is the first research conducted to explain, from a self-regulatory perspective, the influence that is exerted on service employees’ service innovation by their responses to high job demands. The findings identify the effects that service employees’ promotion focus or prevention focus in self-regulation have on their creativity, and the data unravel the role of emotional labour strategy as the mediating mechanism that explains the influence of regulatory focus on service employee creativity. On the basis of the findings, managerial directions are offered with regard to managing service employees’ regulatory focus and emotional labour, with a view to enhancing the creativity and innovation within a service organisation.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document