scholarly journals Intraoperative Neurophysiological Monitoring for Spinal Cord Tumor Surgery: Comparison of Motor and Somatosensory Evoked Potentials According to Tumor Types

2017 ◽  
Vol 41 (4) ◽  
pp. 610 ◽  
Author(s):  
Taeha Park ◽  
Jinyoung Park ◽  
Yoon Ghil Park ◽  
Joowon Lee
Keyword(s):  
Spinal Cord ◽  
Evoked Potentials ◽  
Somatosensory Evoked Potentials ◽  
Spinal Cord Tumor ◽  
Intraoperative Neurophysiological Monitoring ◽  
Neurophysiological Monitoring ◽  
Tumor Surgery ◽  
Tumor Types

Spinal Cord Tumor Surgery—Importance of Continuous Intraoperative Neurophysiological Monitoring After Tumor Resection

Spine ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 37 (16) ◽  
pp. E1001-E1008 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marie-Thérèse Forster ◽  
Gerhard Marquardt ◽  
Volker Seifert ◽  
Andrea Szelényi
Keyword(s):  
Spinal Cord ◽  
Spinal Cord Tumor ◽  
Tumor Resection ◽  
Intraoperative Neurophysiological Monitoring ◽  
Neurophysiological Monitoring ◽  
Tumor Surgery

Transvertebral Transposition of the Spinal Cord for Recovery of Motor Evoked Potentials and Somatosensory Evoked Potentials After Acute Paraplegia During Kyphoscoliosis Surgery: Technique Note, Case Reports and Literature Review

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chao Chen ◽  
Jing Li ◽  
Bingjin Wang ◽  
Lingwei Zhu ◽  
Yong Gao ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Spinal Cord ◽  
Evoked Potentials ◽  
Somatosensory Evoked Potentials ◽  
Motor Evoked Potentials ◽  
Case Reports ◽  
Deformity Correction ◽  
Neurological Deficits ◽  
Intraoperative Neurophysiological Monitoring ◽  
Neurophysiological Monitoring ◽  
Acute Paraplegia

Abstract Background: Neurological impairment during spinal deformity surgery was the most serious complication. When confronting intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring alerts, various surgical management methods such as the release of implants and decompression of the spinal cord are always performed. Transvertebral transposition of the spinal cord is rarely performed, and its role in the management of acute paraplegia is seldom reported.Methods: The authors present two patients with kyphoscoliosis experienced intraoperatively or postoperatively neurological deficits and abnormal neurological monitoring was detected during correction surgery. Acute paraplegia was confirmed by a wake-up test. Subsequent spinal cord transposition was performed. Intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring motor evoked potentials (MEP) and somatosensory evoked potentials (SEP) was performed to detect the changes during the process.Results: After transvertebral transposition of the spinal cord, the MEPs and SEPs were significantly improved in both patients during surgery. The spinal cord function was restored postoperatively and recovered to normal at the final follow-up in two patients. Conclusions： This case demonstrated that instead of decreasing the correction ratio of kyphoscoliosis, transvertebral transposition of the spinal cord under intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring could be an effective therapeutic strategy for acute spinal cord dysfunction caused by deformity correction surgeries.

Spinal Cord Monitoring

2016 ◽  
pp. 798-832
Author(s):  
Jeffrey A. Strommen ◽  
Andrea J. Boon
Keyword(s):  
Spinal Cord ◽  
Evoked Potentials ◽  
Motor Evoked Potentials ◽  
Spinal Cord Tumor ◽  
Tumor Resection ◽  
Neurophysiological Monitoring ◽  
Spinal Root ◽  
Compound Muscle Action Potentials ◽  
Aneurysm Repair ◽  
Aortic Aneurysm Repair

Intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring is a valuable tool to preserve spinal cord and spinal root integrity during surgical procedures. A monitoring plan may include somatosensory evoked potentials (SEP), motor evoked potentials (MEP), compound muscle action potentials (CMAP), and electromyography (EMG). Such monitoring is individualized depending on the preoperative clinical deficit, the structures most at risk, and the surgical and anesthesia plan. The most common use of these techniques is in primary spine disease, where the spinal cord pathways will typically be monitored with both MEP and SEP. In cervical or lumbar spine surgeries, EMG monitoring will help protect the nerve root either during decompression or during pedicle screw placement. Monitoring during spinal cord tumor resection or vascular procedures (such as aortic aneurysm repair) not only helps prevent deficit, but also allows the surgeon to proceed with confidence and not unnecessarily terminate the procedure.

Dorsal Column Mapping via Phase Reversal Method

Neurosurgery ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 74 (4) ◽  
pp. 437-446 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dinesh Nair ◽  
Vishakhadatta M. Kumaraswamy ◽  
Diana Braver ◽  
Ronan D. Kilbride ◽  
Lawrence F. Borges ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Spinal Cord ◽  
Evoked Potentials ◽  
Somatosensory Evoked Potentials ◽  
Spinal Cord Tumor ◽  
Tumor Resection ◽  
Dorsal Column ◽  
Neurological Deficits ◽  
Reliable Technique ◽  
Intramedullary Spinal Cord ◽  
Phase Reversal

ABSTRACT BACKGROUND: Safe resection of intramedullary spinal cord tumors can be challenging, because they often alter the cord anatomy. Identification of neurophysiologically viable dorsal columns (DCs) and of neurophysiologically inert tissue, eg, median raphe (MR), as a safe incision site is crucial for avoiding postoperative neurological deficits. We present our experience with and improvements made to our previously described technique of DC mapping, successfully applied in a series of 12 cases. OBJECTIVE: To describe a new, safe, and reliable technique for intraoperative DC mapping. METHODS: The right and left DCs were stimulated by using a bipolar electric stimulator and the triggered somatosensory evoked potentials recorded from the scalp. Phase reversal and amplitude changes of somatosensory evoked potentials were used to neurophysiologically identify the laterality of DCs, the inert MR, as well as other safe incision sites. RESULTS: The MR location was neurophysiologically confirmed in all patients in whom this structure was first visually identified as well as in those in whom it was not, with 1 exception. DCs were identified in all patients, regardless of whether they could be visually identified. In 3 cases, negative mapping with the use of this method enabled the surgeon to reliably identify additional inert tissue for incision. None of the patients had postoperative worsening of the DC function. CONCLUSION: Our revised technique is safe and reliable, and it can be easily incorporated into routine intramedullary spinal cord tumor resection. It provides crucial information to the neurosurgeon to prevent postoperative neurological deficits.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document